Text this colour is a link for Members only. Support us by becoming a Member for only £3 a month by joining our 'Buy Me A Coffee page'; Membership gives you access to all content and removes ads.

Text this colour links to Pages. Text this colour links to Family Trees. Place the mouse over images to see a larger image. Click on paintings to see the painter's Biography Page. Mouse over links for a preview. Move the mouse off the painting or link to close the popup.



All About History Books

The Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker of Swinbroke. Baker was a secular clerk from Swinbroke, now Swinbrook, an Oxfordshire village two miles east of Burford. His Chronicle describes the events of the period 1303-1356: Gaveston, Bannockburn, Boroughbridge, the murder of King Edward II, the Scottish Wars, Sluys, Crécy, the Black Death, Winchelsea and Poitiers. To quote Herbert Bruce 'it possesses a vigorous and characteristic style, and its value for particular events between 1303 and 1356 has been recognised by its editor and by subsequent writers'. The book provides remarkable detail about the events it describes. Baker's text has been augmented with hundreds of notes, including extracts from other contemporary chronicles, such as the Annales Londonienses, Annales Paulini, Murimuth, Lanercost, Avesbury, Guisborough and Froissart to enrich the reader's understanding. The translation takes as its source the 'Chronicon Galfridi le Baker de Swynebroke' published in 1889, edited by Edward Maunde Thompson. Available at Amazon in eBook and Paperback.

Trial and Execution of Mortimer and his Faction

Trial and Execution of Mortimer and his Faction is in 1330-1339 Edward III and Scottish Independence.

On 19th October 1330 John Neville 1299-1335, William Eland, William Bohun 1st Earl of Northampton (age 20), William Clinton 1st Earl Huntingdon (age 26) and William Montagu 1st Earl Salisbury (age 29), friends of King Edward III of England (age 17) secretly entered Nottingham Castle [Map] through tunnels, met with King Edward III of England, and arrested Roger Mortimer 1st Earl March (age 43) and his son Geoffrey Mortimer (age 21) in the presence of Isabella of France Queen Consort England (age 35).

On 29th November 1330 Roger Mortimer 1st Earl March (age 43) was hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn [Map] accused of assuming royal power and of various other high misdemeanours. His body hung at the gallows for two days and nights. He was buried at Christ Church, Greyfriars [Map]. Isabella of France Queen Consort England (age 35) subsequently requested his burial at Wigmore Abbey [Map] and, after firstly refusing, King Edward III of England (age 18) allowed his remains to be removed to Wigmore Abbey [Map]. His grandson Roger (age 2) succeeded 2nd Earl March, 4th Baron Mortimer of Wigmore.

Chronicle of Robert Fabyan [-1512]. [17th October 1330]. In ye moneth of Octobre, upon the. xvii. daye, and euyn of seynt Luke, syr Roger Mortymer (age 43) before named, by means of syr Wyllyam Montaygne (age 29), syr Rafe Staforde, syr lohn Neuyle, and other, by a compassyd meane was takyn in the castell of Notyngham [Map], notwithstandyrige that the keyes of the sayde eastell were dayly and nyghtlye under his warde and kepynge; the kynge, the quene, the olde quene (age 35), with dyuerse other noblys that beynge in the same eastell lodgyd. The maner of the takynge of this erle syr Roger Mortymer I passe ouer, for the dyuersyte that I haue seen thereof of sundry wryters; but many agreen, yt he with syr Symonde of Bedforde, & other, were in that nyght takyn, and after sent unto the Towre of London, and there put in streyghte kepynge. Then the kynge, in short processe after, callyd a parlyament at London for ye reformacion of many thynges rnysorderyd in the realme, by mtatie of the foresayde syr Roger, as the comon fame then went.

Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker of Swinbroke [-1360]. In the year of our Lord 1330, in the fourth year of King Edward III, on the Friday following the feast of Saint Luke [19th October], a parliament was held at Nottingham,1 where Roger de Mortimer, Earl of March, shone with excessive but fading honour.2 He was considered the chief counsellor of Queen Isabella, at whose command all things were arranged. No one dared to refer to him by any title other than 'Earl of March.' He was accompanied by a greater noise and company of men than the king himself. Those he loved, he honoured. He allowed the king to rise in his presence, and arrogantly used to walk beside the king, step for step, never yielding precedence, and sometimes even walking ahead of him. When a certain official assigned to the king for arranging noble lodgings gave lodging in the town to the Earl of Lancaster, the king's cousin, the Earl of March harshly rebuked him, demanding to know who had made him so bold as to house the queen's enemy so near her. Terrified, the constable reassigned Lancaster's lodging to a place a full league outside the town, and instead gave the chamber to John de Bohun, Earl of Hereford and Essex, the Constable of England. Murmurs rose among the magnates, whispers that spread to the common people, saying in secret that Mortimer, the queen's lover and the king's master, was striving for the ruin of royal blood and the usurpation of royal majesty. This murmuring reached the royal ears and alarmed the king's friends, namely William de Montagu (age 29), Edward de Bohun, and others who, having sworn an oath for the king's safety, judged, and rightly, that it would serve the good of the realm if Mortimer were put to death.

Anno Domini MCCCXXX, ipsius regis Edwardi tercii anno iIIJ, die Veneris proxima post festum sancti Luce, fuit parliamentum apud Notyngham, ubi nimio fulsit honoure marcessibili comes Marchie, Rogerus de Mortuo mari, tamquam regine Isabelle, ad cuius nutum omnia disponebantur, conciliarius principalis. Illum non alio nomine quam titulo comitis Marchie ausus est aliquis nominare; illum maior strepitus virorum comitabatur quam personam regis; ille quos amavit honouravit; regem permittens sibi assurgere, gradiens cum rege pari passu solebat arroganter ambulare, nunquam regem preferre, set ipsum aliquando anteire. Quemdam officiarium deputatum domino regi pro ospiciis nobilium assignandis, ospicium in villa "pro comite Lancastrie regis consanguineo capescentem, vehementer increpuit iste comes Marchie, querens quis eum fecerat audacem inimicum regine Isabelle tam prope illam hospitare; unde territus constabularius ospicium comiti Lancastrie ultra villam ad unam leucam domino assignavit, et comitem Herefordie Essexieque Iohannem de Bohun, constabularium Anglie, ospicio collocavit. Fit murmur inter magnates, quod ad aures populares avolavit, secreto dicencium quod ille de Mortuo mari, amasius regine et regis magister, ad regalis sanguinis demolicionem et regie magestatis usurpacionem anelaret. Terruit iste murmur aures regales et regis amicos, scilicet Willelmum de Monte acuto, Edwardum de Bohun et alios qui, in salutem regis coniurati, arbitrati sunt, et juste, obsequium salutis se prestituros regno, si ille de Mortuo mari morti committeretur.

Note 1. Stow Annales 356, 357.

It will be seen that Stow has quite misunderstood the passage: 'a certain official,' etc.

By the side of this passage from Stow may be placed a chapter from the Brute chronicle (Harley MS. 2279).

Note 2. Compare what Knighton 2552.

The Brute chronicle (Harley MS. 2279).

Annales of England by John Stow. [19th October 1330] There was a parliament holden at Nottingham, where Roger Mortimer was in such glory and honour that it was without all comparison. No man durst name him any other than earle of March ; a greater route of men waited at his heeles than on the kings person ; he would suffer the king to rise to him and would walke with the king equally, step by step and cheeke by cheeke, never preferring the king, but would go formost himselfe with his officers ; he greatly rebuked the earle of Lancaster, cousin to the king, for that without his consent he appointed certain lodgings for noblemen in the town, demanding who made him so bold, to take up lodgings so nigh unto the queen : with which words the constable, being greatly feared, appointed lodging for the earle of Lancaster one myle out of the towne : and likewise were lodged the earle of Hereford, John de Bohune of Estsex, high constable of England, and others. By which meanes a contention rose among the noblemen and great murmuring among the common people, who said that Roger Mortimer, the queenes paragon and the kings master, sought all the means he could to destroy the kings blood and to usurpe the regall majestic : which report troubled much the kings friends, to wit, William Montacute and other, who, for the safegard of the king, sware themselves to be true to his person, and drew unto them Robert de Holland, who had of long time been chiefe keeper of the castle, unto whome all secret corners of the same were knowne. Then upon a certaine night, the king lying without the castle, both he and his friends were brought by torch-light through a secret way under ground, beginning far off from the said castle, till they came even to the queens chamber, which they by chaunce found open : they therfore, being armed with naked swords in their hands, went forwards, leaving the king also armed without the doore of the chamber, least that his mother should espie him : they which entred in slew Hugh Turpinton, knight, who resisted them, master John Nevell of Horneby giving him his deadly wound. From thence they went toward the queene mother, whome they found with the earle of March, readie to have gone to bedde ; and having taken the said earle, they ledde him out into the hall, after whom the queene followed, crying, Bel filz, bel filz, ayes pitie de gentil Mortimer, Good sonne, good sonne, take pitie upon gentle Mortimer: for she suspected that her sonne was there, though she saw him not. Then are the keyes of tHe castle sent for, and every place with all the furniture is yeelded up into the kings hands, but in such secret wise that none without the castle, except the kings friends, understood thereof. The next day in the morning very early they bring Roger Mortimer and other his friends taken with him, with an horrible shout and crying (the earle of Lancaster,"then blind, being one of them that made the shout for joy), towards London, where he was committed to the Tower, and afterwards condemned at Westminster, in presence of the whole parliament, on S. Andrewes eeven next following, and then drawne to the Elmes, and there hanged on the common gallowes ... He was condemned by his peeres, and yet never was brought to answer before them, for it was not then the custome, after the death of the earles of Lancaster, Winchester, Glocester, and Kent : wherefore this earle had that law himselfe, which he appointed for other.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Chronicle of the Kings of England by Richard Baker. [19th October 1330] And as for Mortimer, (lying then in the Castle of Nottingham and lately created Earl of the Marches of Wales) he was seised on in this manner; the King taking with him William Montacute (age 29), Robert Holland, and others, go secretly one night by Torch-light, through a privy way under ground, till they come to the Queens (age 35) Chamber; where leaving the King without, they entred and found the Queen with Mortimer (age 43), ready to go to bed: then laying hands on him, they led him forth, after whom the Queen followed, crying, Bel fits, ayes pitie du gentil Mortimer; good fon, good fon, take pity upon the gentle Mortimer, suspecting that her son had been among them. This course was taken to apprehend him for avoiding of tumult, he having no fewer then ninescore Knights and Gentlemen, besides other meaner servants continually about him.

Froissart Book 1: 1307-1340. [43] It was not long after that a great rumor spread about the mother of the King of England, I do not know if it was true, that she was pregnant; and more than anyone else, Lord Mortimer was blamed for this. Then scandal began to grow greatly, until the young king was thoroughly informed of it. Along with that, he was sufficiently informed that, through false deceit and the envy of Lord Mortimer, carried out more through treason than through justice, he had caused his uncle, the Earl of Kent, to be put to death, a man whom all the people of the realm had always considered honorable and loyal. So, if the young king was saddened and angered, it is no wonder. He immediately had the said Lord Mortimer arrested [19th October 1330] and brought to London before a great number of the barons and nobles of his kingdom.

[43] Ne demora mies de puis gaires de temps que grant fame issi hors sus la mère dou roy d'Engleterre, ne sai mies se voirs estoit, que elle estoit [enchainte] []; et en encoupoit on plus de ce fait le signeur de Mortemer que nul aultre. Si commença durement chilz escandeles à montepliier, tant que li jones rois en fu enfourmés souffissamment. Et avoech tout ce il fu enfourmés souffissamment que, par fausse amise et par envie dou signeur de Mortemer, faite plus par trahison que par raison, il avoit fait mettre à mort son oncle le conte de Kent, que tout cil dou pays tenoient et avoient toutdis tenu pour preudomme et pour loyal. Dont, se li jones rois fu tristes et courouciés, ce ne fait mies à demander. Si fist tantost prendre le dit signeur de Mortemer, et le fist amener à Londres, par devant grant fuison des barons et des nobles de son royaume.

The Brut. 19th October 1330. And the same nyghte sir William Mountagu and alle the lordes of his querelle and the same constable also wente hem to horse, and maden semblaunt as hit were for to wende oute of the Mortymeris sight. But anone, as the Mortymer herde this tithing, he wende that thei wolde have gone over the see for drede of him ; and anone he and his company nome councel amonges hem, for to lette hire passage, and sente lettres anone unto the portis, so that none of the grete lordes shulde wende home into hire centre, but if he were arreste and taken. And, amonge other thinges, William Elande, constable of the forsaide castel, priviliche ladde sire William Mountagu and his companye by the forsaide wey under erth, so til thei comen into the castel, and wente up into the toure, ther that the Mortymer was in. But sir Hugh of Trompetone hem ascriede hidously and seide: 'A! treytours, it is al for noughte that ye beth come into this castel. Ye shulde die yit in evel deth everichone.' And anone one of hem that was in Mountagues companye up with a mace and smote the same Hugh uppon the hede, that the brayne brake oute and fel on the ground ; and so was he dede in evel deth. Tho nomen thei the Mortymer, as he armede him at the toures dore, whan he herde the noyse of hem, for drede. And when the quene Isabel sawe that the Mortymer was taken, she made moche sorowe in herte and these wordes unto hem seide: 'Now, faire sires, I yow preye that ye done none harme unto his bodie, a worthi knyghte, our welbelovede frende, and oure dere cosyn.' Tho wente thei thens and comen and broughte the Mortymer and presente him unto the kyng Edwarde ; and he comaunded to bring him into safe warde. But anone, as they that were consente unto the Mortymeris doyng herde telle that he was taken, thei wente and hid hem, and priveliche by nyghte wente oute of the toune everych on his side, with hevy herte and mournyng, and levede uppon hire landes as wel as thei myghte. And so that same yeer that the Mortymer was take, he had atte his retenu ix score knyghtes, withoute squyers and sergeauntes of armes and fote men. And tho was the Mortymer lad to London, and sir Symound of Bereforde was ladde with him, and was take to the constable to kepe. But afterward was the Mortymeris life examynede atte Westmynstre, bifore the kyng and bifore alle the grete lordes of Engelonde, for perel that myghte falle to the reaume; and to inquere also whiche were assentyng to sir Edwardis deth, the kynges fader; and also, thurgh whome the Scottis ascaped fro Stanhope into Scotlande, withoute the wille of kyng Edwarde ; and also, how the charter of Ragman was delyvered unto the Scottis, wherin the homages and the feautees of Scotlande were conteynede that the Scottis shulde done evermore unto the kynges of Engelonde for the reame of Scotlande. Wherfor in his absence he was dempnede to bene drawe and hongede for his tresoun. And this meschief come unto him in Seint Andrewes eve and in the yeer of Incarnacion of our Lorde lesu Criste MCCC and XXX.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. A parliament was held at Nottingham, where, on the morrow [19th October 1330] of Saint Luke the Evangelist, the king had Roger de Mortimer, his son Geoffrey, and the knight Sir Simon de Bereford arrested and sent to the Tower of London. On the vigil of Saint Andrew1 next following, the said Roger, lately made earl of March, was drawn through the streets of London by horses and hanged, and two days later, by the king's grace, his body was granted to the Friars Minor, and on the following day it was buried with honour.

Factum est parliamentum apud Notingham, ubi in crastino Sancti Lucæ Evangelista rex arrestari fecit Rogerum de Mortuo-mari, Galfridum filium suum, Symonem de Berford militem, et ad Turrim Londoniarum transmisit: in vigilia vero Sancti Andreæ proximo sequente dictus Rogerus, comes Marchiæ nuper factus, Londoniis tractus est equis atque suspensus, ac post duos dies de gratia regis fratribus Minoribus corpus ejus conceditur, et die sequenti honorifice sepelitur.

Note 1. The vigil of St. Andrew was the 29th of November; but we learn from the Parliament Rolls, that Mortimer Earl of March was attainted of treason at the Parliament held at Westminster on Monday, the 26th of November and executed on the Thursday following. The King summoned a parliament to meet at Westminster on the 26th of November, for the trial of the Earl of March and his accomplices. In the articles of impeachment exhibited against him (printed at full in the Rot. Parl. 2.52) he was charged with the murder of Edward II and the Earl of Kent, with having appropriated to himself the twenty thousand marks paid by Scotland, &c. The parliament declaring him notoriously guilty of the charges, he was condemned and executed without hearing: in consequence of which, in 28 Edward III, the judgment was reversed as erroneous, and his grandson Roger restored to his title and estate.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Scalacronica. [19th October 1330]. The council having been dissolved, the said William (age 29) said to the King that it were better to eat the dog than that the dog [should eat] them; so he advised him to speak to the constable of the castle, charging him upon his oath and allegiance to keep the plan secret, and [directing] him to leave a postern open to the park that very night, and [warning him] that if he would not do so, he [the King] would cause him to be hanged so soon as he [the King] should have the upper hand. The said William arranged with his comrades to assemble by night at a certain thicket in the park to which all should come; but they missed the trysting place, except the said William de Montacute and John de Nevill with four-and-twenty men, who kept their appointment well.

They were afraid that their comrades might miss them, and they durst not sound a call because of the sentries in the castle; and so, as bold and enterprising men, they declared that, as the matter had gone so far, they would risk the adventure by themselves. They went forward, and found the postern open, as the King had commanded. They entered the castle and mounted the stairs of the second court without meeting anybody, for it was mirk night, and the followers of the [gentle] folk had left the castle for their lodgings. The Queen (age 35), Mortimer (age 43), and their confidential adherents were holding a council to take measures against this plot which had been discovered to them. They [the conspirators] entered the hall where the Queen was sitting in council. The usher cried out at their entry. Hugh de Turpington, who was steward of the King's household, [but] was of the Queen's party, rushed out of the council and met them in the middle of the hall, crying 'Down with the traitors!' and made to strike the first [of them] with a dagger, when John de Nevill ran him through the body and slew him, and an esquire [also] who offered resistance.

Then they passed forward into the chamber, and seized Mortimer and those whom they wished to have; so that before dawn none remained in the town save those who were of the King's party, who had armed themselves when the conspirators entered the castle.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Rotuli Parliamentorum Volume 2. November 1330. No. 3i. All the peers, earls, and barons assembled at this parliament at Westminster have strictly examined, and thereupon are agreed and resolved as follows: that John Mautravers (age 40) is guilty of the death of Edmund, Earl of Kent, uncle of our lord the king who now is, as being the one who principally, treacherously, and wickedly contrived the death of the said earl; in such wise that, whereas the said John knew of the death of King Edward, nevertheless the said John, by crafty means and by his false and evil deceits, made the said earl believe that the king was alive, which false contrivance was the cause of the death of the said earl, and of all the evil that followed therefrom. Wherefore the aforesaid peers of the land, and the judges of parliament, adjudge and award that the said John be drawn, hanged, and beheaded as a traitor, wherever he may be found. And the aforesaid peers of the land pray our lord the king that he will command that writs be made to cause it to be published and proclaimed throughout the realm, that whoever shall take the said John alive and bring him to the king shall have one thousand marks; and if by chance he cannot be taken alive, whoever brings his head shall have five hundred pounds, by gift of the king.

Tres touz les Peres, Countes, & Barouns, assemblez a ceste Parlement a Westm', si ont examine estraitement, & sur ce sont assentuz & acordez, travers. Qe Johan Mautravers si est cupable de la mort Esmon Counte de Kent, le uncle notre Seignur le Roi q̃ ore est, come celui q̃ principaument, traiterousement, & sauffement la mort le dit Counte compassa, issint q̃ la ou le dit Johan savoit la mort le Roi Edward, ne purquant le dit Johan par enginouse manere et par ses fausses et mauveyse sotinetes fist le dit Counte entendre la vie le Roi, lequel faus compassement fust cause de la mort le dit Counte, et de tut le mal q̃ s'enfut. Par qoi les susditz Peres de la terre, & Juges du Parlement, ajuggent & agardent q̃ le dit Johan soit treyne, pendu, & decolle, come Treitre, queu part q'il soit trove. Et prient les Peres susditz a nostre Seign' le Roi, q'il voille comander q̃ Briefs soient faitz de faire publier & crier par tut le Roialme, q̃ qi purra prendre le dit Johan vif, et le mesne au Roi, il auera M marcs; et si par cas ne purra estre pris vif, q̃ qi porte sa teste il auera D livres, du doun le Roi.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

All About History Books

The Deeds of King Henry V, or in Latin Henrici Quinti, Angliæ Regis, Gesta, is a first-hand account of the Agincourt Campaign, and subsequent events to his death in 1422. The author of the first part was a Chaplain in King Henry's retinue who was present from King Henry's departure at Southampton in 1415, at the siege of Harfleur, the battle of Agincourt, and the celebrations on King Henry's return to London. The second part, by another writer, relates the events that took place including the negotiations at Troye, Henry's marriage and his death in 1422.

Available at Amazon as eBook or Paperback.

Rotuli Parliamentorum Volume 2. November 1330. No. 5. Item, to such judgment it is assented and agreed concerning the death of Thomas de Gurney and William de Ocle, for the death of King Edward, father of our lord the king who now is, whom they falsely and treacherously murdered: and that whoever may take the said Thomas alive shall have one hundred pounds; and whoever brings his head, one hundred marks. Likewise, that whoever may take the said William alive shall have one hundred marks; and whoever brings his head, if by chance he cannot be taken alive, shall have forty pounds, by gift of the king.

Item, a tieu juggement est assentuz & acorde de mort Thomas de Gurney, & William de Ocle, pur las mort le Roi Edward, Piere nr̃e Seignur le Roi q̃ ore est, q̃ fauxement & traiterousement lui murdrerunt; Et q̃ qi puisse prendre le dit Thomas vif, avera c łi. et q̃ qi porte la teste, c marcz. Estre ce, q̃ qi puisse prendre le dit William vif, avera c marcz, & qi q̃ porte la teste, si par cas ne puisse estre pris vif, il avera XL łi. du doun le Roi.

Rotuli Parliamentorum Volume 2. November 1330. No. 4. Furthermore, to such judgment it is agreed that the same shall be done concerning Boeges de Bayons and John Deveroill, for the aforesaid cause. And that whoever may take the said Boeges alive and bring him to the king shall have one hundred pounds; or whoever brings his head shall have one hundred marks. And that whoever may take the said John alive and bring him to the king shall have one hundred marks; and whoever brings his head shall have forty pounds, by gift of the king.

Estre ce, au tiel juggement est acorde q̃ soit fait de Boeges de Bayons, & Johan Deveroill, par la cause susdite, et q̃ qi purra prendre le dit Boeges vif, mesne au Roi, auera C livres; ou qi porte la teste, il auera cent marcz. arcz. Et q̃ qi purra prendre le dit Johan vif, & mesne au Roi, auera C marcz, et qi q̃ port la teste auera XL livres, du doun le Roi.

Rotuli Parliamentorum Volume 2. After 25th November 1330. No. 15. Thomas de Berkeley (age 34), knight, came before the lord king in his full parliament aforesaid, and being addressed concerning this: that whereas Lord Edward, late King of England, father of the present lord king, was delivered into the custody of the said Thomas and of one John Mautravers (age 40) to be safely kept in the castle of the said Thomas at Berkeley in the county of Gloucester, and in that same castle, while in the custody of the said Thomas and John, was murdered and slain , how does he wish to acquit himself of the death of the said king? He says that he was never consenting, aiding, or procuring in his death, nor ever knew of his death until the present parliament. And of this he is ready to acquit himself, as the court of the king shall consider. And thereupon he was asked, since he is lord of the said castle, and the same lord king was delivered into the custody of him and John Mautravers to be safely kept, and they received and accepted that custody, how can he excuse himself from being bound to answer for the death of the said king? And the aforesaid Thomas says that it is true that he is lord of the said castle, and that he, together with John Mautravers, received custody of the said king to keep him safely, as aforesaid. But he says that at the time when the said lord king is said to have been murdered and slain, he was kept at Bradley, outside the said castle, by such and so great an illness that nothing remained to his memory. And it was said to him that, since he acknowledges that he, together with the said John, held the custody of the said lord king, and that he placed under himself keepers and ministers for making that custody, how can he excuse himself from answering in this matter on the ground of some illness? And the aforesaid Thomas says that he placed under him such keepers and ministers in the said castle to make the custody, in whom he trusted as in himself, who together with the said John Mautravers had the custody of the said king. Wherefore he says that of the death of the said lord king, by aid, assent, or procurement, he is in no way guilty. And of this, for good and ill, he puts himself upon the country. Therefore there came jurors before the lord king in his parliament at Westminster, in the octave of St. Hilary next to come, etc. On which day the aforesaid Thomas came before the lord king in his full parliament, and likewise the jurors, namely John Darcy, John de Wisham, William Trussell, Roger de Swynerton, Constantine de Mortimer, John de Saint Philibert, Richard de Rivers, Peter Husee, John de Brynton, Richard de la Rivere, Roger Dabenhale, and Richard de Croupes, all knights. Who say upon their oath that the aforesaid Thomas de Berkeley is in no way guilty of the death of the said lord Edward the king, father of the present lord king, nor of assent, aid, or procurement of his death. And they say that at the time of the death of the said lord Edward the king, father of the present lord king, he was so grievously burdened with illness at Bradley, outside his said castle, that his life was despaired of. Therefore the same Thomas is acquitted thereof. And the jurors being asked whether the same Thomas ever withdrew himself on account of the aforesaid matter, they say that he did not. And because the aforesaid Thomas had placed under him keepers and ministers, namely Thomas de Gurney and William de Ocle, to make custody of the said lord king, by whom the same lord king was murdered and slain, a day is given to him before the present lord king at his next parliament, for hearing his judgment, etc. And the aforesaid Thomas de Berkeley is meanwhile committed to Ralph de Neville, steward of the lord king’s household, etc.

Thomas de Berkele Mil' venit coram Dño Rege in pleno Parliamento suo predco, & allocutus de hoc, quod cum Dñus Edwardus nuper Rex Anglie, pater Dñi Regis nunc, in custodia ipsius Thome et cujusdam Johnis Mautravers nuper extitit liberatus ad salvo custodiendum in Castro ipsius Thome apud Berkele in Com' Gloucestrie, et in eodem Castro in custodia ipsorum Thome & Johnis murdratus extitit & interfectus, Qualiter se velit de morte ipsius Regis acquietare? Dicit, quod ipse nuncquam suit confentiens, auxilians, seu procurans, ad mortem suam, nec unquã scivit de morte sua usq; in presenti Parliamento isto. Et de hoc paratus est se acquietare, prout Curia Regis confideraverit. Et super hoc quesitum est ab eo, ex quo ipse est Dominus Castri predicti, et idem Dñus Rex in custodia ipsor' Thome & Johis extitit liberatus ad salvo custodiendum, et ipsi custodiam ipsius Regis receperunt & acceptarunt, Qualiter se excusare possit, quin de morte ipsius Regis respondere debeat? Et predictus Thomas dicit, quod verum est, quod ipse est Dominus Castri predicti, et quod ipse simul cum Joie Mautravers custodiam ipsius Regis recepit ad salvo custodiendum, ut podictum est. Set dicit, quod eo tempore, quo dicitur ipsum Dominum Regem esse murdratum & interfectum, fuit ipse tali & tanta infirmitate apud Bradeleye extra Castrum predictum detentus, quod nichil ei currebat memorie. Et super hoc dictum est ei, quod ex quo cognovit quod ipse simul cum dicto Johe custodiam ipsius Domini Regis optinuit, ut predictum est, et ipse Custodes & Ministros sub se posuit, ad custodia de eo faciend', si per aliquam infirmitatem se excusare possit, quin respondere debeat in hac parte? Et predictus Thomas dicit, quod ipse posuit sub se tales Custodes & Ministros in Castro predicto pro custodia facienda, in quibus ipse se confidebat ut de seipso, qui custodiam ipsius Regis simul cum predicto Johne Mautravers inde habuerunt. Unde dicit, quod ipse dè morte ipsius Domini Regis, auxilio, assensu, seu procuratione mortis sue in nullo est inde culpabilis. Et de hoc de bono & malo ponit de super patriam. Ideo venerunt inde Jurat' coram Domino Rege in Parliamento suo apud Westm', in octabis Sci Hillarii proximo futuri &c. Ad quem diem venit predictus Thomas coram Domino Rege, in pleno Parliamento suo, et similiter Juratores, scilicet, Johnes Darcy, Johnes de Wisham, Willus Trussel, Rogerus de Swynenerton, Constantinus de Mortymer, Johnes de São Philiberto, Richardus de Rivers, Petrus Hufee, Joines de Brynton, Ricus de la Rivere, Rogerus Dabenhale, & Ricus de Croupes, omnes Milites, Qui dicunt super sacramentum suum, quod predictus Thomas de Berkele in nullo est culpabilis de morte predicti Domini Edwardi Regis, patris Domini Regis nunc; nec de assensu, auxilio, seu procuratione mortis ejusdem: Et dicunt, quod tempore mortis ejusdem Dñi Edwardi Regis, patris Domini Regis nunc, fuit ipse tali infirmitate gravatus apud Bradeleye extra Castrum suum predictum, quod de vita ejus desperabatur. Ideo idem Thomas inde quietus. Et Juratores quesiti, si idem Thomas unquam subtraxit se occasione predicta? dicunt quod non. Et quia predictus Thomas posuit Custodes & Ministros sub se, scilt Thomam de Gurneye, & Willm de Ocle, ad custodiam de ipso Domino Rege faciendam, per quos idem Dñus Rex extitit murdratus & interfectus; datus est ei dies coram Domino Rege nunc in proximo Parliamento suo, de audiendo Judicio suo &c. Et predcus Thomas de Berkele interim committitur Radulpho de Nevill, Senescallo Hospitii Domini Regis &c.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker of Swinbroke [-1360]. At dawn the next day, with a hue and cry and terrible shouting, the now-blind Earl of Lancaster raising the alarm, Roger de Mortimer and several of his captured associates were led through Loughborough and Leicester toward London, where he was confined in the Tower, as in ancient times, imprisoned. There, as parliament sat at Westminster,1 on the vigil of Saint Andrew [29th November 1330], he was drawn and hanged.2 Thus did he end his life upon the common gallows for thieves at Tyburn, having so often stirred up civil wars throughout his life. He was justly condemned to death by his peers, though he never appeared before them nor answered any charges, for since the deaths of the Earls of Lancaster, Winchester, Gloucester, and Kent, it had become customary for nobles not to be assigned to trial by argument, but to perish without response or lawful conviction. Therefore, this earl suffered the same measure he had once prescribed to others justly receiving what he had meted out.

In aurora crastina hutesio et orribili clamore, ipso comite Lancastrie iam ceco hutesiante, adducunt Rogerum de Mortuo mari et quosdam alios amicos eius secum captos per Lowhtobergh et Leicestriam versus Londonias, ubi in turri ut quondam antiquitus carceri fuit mancipatus, et, apud Westmonasterium assidente regni parliamento, in vigilia sancti Andree sequenti tractus et suspensus, guerras intestinas per totam vitam suam crebro suscitatas, super communi furca latronum apud Elmes, sua morte finivit. Per suos pares fuit morti condigne adiudicatus, non tamen venit coram eiis nec responsioni ratiocinatus, quoniam a morte comitis Lancastrie, Wintonie, et Gloucestrie, et Cancie, non solebant nobiles ratiocinio deputari, set sine responsione atque legitima conviccione perierunt; unde comes iste iure quod in alterum statuit usus extitit, et iuste eadem mensura quam aliis mensus fuerat erat eidem remensum.

Note 1. This parliament was summoned on the 23rd October 1330, and sat from the 26th November to the 6th December.

Note 2. Froissart 43.

Jean Le Bel 1.100

Chronicle of Robert Fabyan [-1512]. [29th November 1330]. In this. iiii. mayres yere, & ende of y thyrde yere of thys kynge, duryngc the foresayd parliament, as aboue is towchyd, at London, the foresayde syr Roger Mortymer (age 43) was accusyd before the lordys of the parlyament of these artyclys with other; wherof. v. I fynde expressyd. And firste was layed unto his charge that by his meanys syr Edwarde of Carnaruan, by mooste tyrannouse deth in the castell of Barkley was murderyd; secondaryly, that, to the kynges great dyshonoure and damage, the Scottys, by his meanys and treason, escapyd from the kyng at the parke Stanhope, whiche then shuld haue fallen in the kynges daunger, ne had been the fauoure by the sayde Roger to them tha shewyd; thyrdely to hym was layed, that he, for execucion of the sayd treason, receyued of the capytayne of ye sayd Scottis, narnyd syr lamys Dowglas, great summys of money, and also for lyke mecle he had, to the kynges great dyshonoure & hurte of his realme, concludyd a peace atwene the kynge & the Scottis, & causyd to be delyuered unto they in the chartyr or endenture called Ragman, with many other thynges, to the Scottys great aduauntage and inpouerysshynge of this realme of Englande; fourtlye, was layed to hym, that where by syuystre & vnlefull meanys, cotrary the kynges pleasure and wyll, or assent of the lordys of the kynges counceyll, he had gotten into his possessyon moche of the kynges treasoure, he vnskylfully wasted & mysspent it; by reason whereof the kyng was in necessyte, and dryuen parforce to assaye his frendys: fyfthlye, that he also had enproperyd unto hym dyuerse wardys belongynge to the kynge, to his great lucre & the kynges great hurt, and that he was more secret wt quene Isabell, the kynges mother, that was to Goddes pleasure or the kynges honoure: the whiche artycles, with other agayne hym prouyd, he was, by auctoryte of ye sayde parlyament, iugyd to deth, and vpo seynt Andrewys euyn next ensuynge, at London, he was drawyn and hangyd.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Scalacronica. [29th November 1330]. He [the King] gave directions for the custody of his mother, and took the said Mortimer (age 43) with him to Leicester, where he intended to put him to death; but he took other advice, causing a Parliament to be summoned to London, where Mortimer was drawn and hanged, upon a charge of having been party to the death of the King, the father [Edward II.], and because of the death of the Earl of Kent, and for the renunciation of the right to Scotland, and for the dissipation of the King's treasure which had been entrusted to him by his [Edward's] father, and upon other counts with which he was charged.

The lords who had been banished were restored. For a long time after this the King acted upon the advice of William de Montacute (age 29), who always encouraged him to excellence and honour and love of arms; and so they led their young lives in pleasant fashion, until there came a more serious time with serious matters.

Froissart Book 1: 1307-1340. [43] And he had all the deeds of Lord Mortimer recounted by one of his knights, as they had been recorded and written down. And when all was told and declared, the King of England asked them all, as a form of counsel and judgment, what should rightly be done. The judgment was returned quickly, for each one had already been made fully aware and informed by rumor and true testimony. They responded to the king and said that he ought to die in the same manner as Sir Hugh Despenser had done and had been executed. To this judgment, there was no delay and no mercy. He was immediately [29th November 1330] drawn through the city of London on a hurdle, and then tied up on a scaffold in the middle of the square. There his genitals were cut off and thrown into a fire that had been prepared. Then his belly was opened and his heart was pulled out—because he had planned and committed treason—and it was thrown into the same fire, as was all his entrails. Then he was quartered, and the four parts were sent to four major cities in England, and the head remained in London. Thus ended Sir Roger de Mortimer. May God forgive him all his sins!

[43] Et fist conter par un sien chevalier tous les fais le signeur de Mortemer, ensi que escrire et registrer les avoit fais. Et quant il furent tout dit et conté, li dis rois d'Engleterre demanda à tous, par manière de conseil et de jugement, quel cose en estoit bon à faire. Li jugemens en fu assés tost rendus, car cescuns en estoit jà par fame et par juste information tous avisés et infourmés. Si en respondirent au roy, et disent que il devoit morir en tel manière, comme messires Hues li Despensiers avoit fait et esté justiciés. A ce jugement n'eut nulle dilation ne de merci. Si fu tantos trainés parmi la cité de Londres sus un bahut, et puis loiiés sus une eschielle en mi le place, et puis li vis copés à toutes les coulles et jettées en un feu qui là estoit. Et puis li fu li ventres ouvers et li coers trais hors, pour tant que il en avoit fait et pensé le trahison, et jettés ou dit feu, et ensi toute se coraille. Et puis fu esquartelés, et envoiiés par quatre mestres cités en Engleterre, et la tieste demora à Londres. Ensi fina li dis messires Rogiers de Mortemer, Dieus li pardoinst tous ses fourfais!

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Chronicle of the Kings of England by Richard Baker. 29th November 1330. But thus seised on, he is committed presently to the Tower, accused of divers great crimes, whereof these were chief; That he had procured the late Kings death; That he had been the Author of the Scots safe escaping st Stanhope Park, corrupted with the gift of thirty thousand pounds; That he had procured the late Marriage and Peace with Scotland, so dishononrable to the King and Kingdom; That he had been too familiar with the Queen, as by whom she was thought to be with Childe. Of which Articles he was found guilty and condemned; and thereupon is drawn and hanged upon the common Gallows at.the Elms, now called Tyburn, where his body remained two dayes as an opprobrious spectacle for all beholders.

Chronicle of Jean le Bel. [29th November 1330] The judgment was quite clear and was soon agreed upon, for everyone had already been informed by rumor even before the king himself knew anything. Nevertheless, the sentence was ordered in such a way that he would die in the same manner as Sir Hugh Despenser. And so it was done: he was immediately drawn through the city of London on a hurdle and tied to a ladder in the middle of the square. Then his private parts were cut off, and his testicles; and afterwards, his belly was split open, and all his entrails were removed and burned. Then his head was cut off, and finally he was hanged by the hips. Soon after, the young king had his mother, the lady Queen Isabella, placed in a fine castle, and provided her with enough ladies and chambermaids to guard, serve, and keep her company, along with household officers and squires. He assigned her a large estate to provide for her comfortably for the rest of her life. But he did not wish to allow or consent that she go anywhere outside that castle openly, as I heard it said at the time. And I believe she remains there still to this day.

Le jugement en estoit assez cler, et fust tantost accordé, car chascun en estoit infourmé par fame ainchoys que le roy en sceust riens ; toutesfois, le jugement fut ainsy ordonné que il morroit par telle maniere que messire Hue le Despensier. Ainsy fut fait?, et fut tantost trayné par la cité de Londres sur ung bahu ct lié sur une eschiele enmy la place; et puis luy fut le vit couppé et les coulles, et puis aprez le ventre fendu et toutes les entrailles ostées et arses, et puis on lui couppa la teste, et puis fut pendu par les hanches. Et tlantost le jœune roy fist enfermer mademe sa mere en ung bcau chastel!, ct luy livra dames et chambrieres assez pour le garder, servir et faire compaignie, et mesnie, el escuiers, et luy assigna grande terre pour le souffisaument tenir tout le cours de sa vye. Maiz il ne voulut mie souffrir ne consentir qu'elle alast nulle part hors de cellui chastel apertement, ainsy que je l'ouy adoncques raconter. Encores crois je qu'elle s'y tiengne au temps present.

Become a Member via our 'Buy Me a Coffee' page to read complete text.

Before 7th July 1333 Thomas Gurney died whilst returning from Spain to be examined about the death of King Edward II.