William of Worcester's Chronicle of England

William of Worcester, born around 1415, and died around 1482 was secretary to John Fastolf, the renowned soldier of the Hundred Years War, during which time he collected documents, letters, and wrote a record of events. Following their return to England in 1440 William was witness to major events. Twice in his chronicle he uses the first person: 1. when writing about the murder of Thomas, 7th Baron Scales, in 1460, he writes '… and I saw him lying naked in the cemetery near the porch of the church of St. Mary Overie in Southwark …' and 2. describing King Edward IV's entry into London in 1461 he writes '… proclaimed that all the people themselves were to recognize and acknowledge Edward as king. I was present and heard this, and immediately went down with them into the city'. William’s Chronicle is rich in detail. It is the source of much information about the Wars of the Roses, including the term 'Diabolical Marriage' to describe the marriage of Queen Elizabeth Woodville’s brother John’s marriage to Katherine, Dowager Duchess of Norfolk, he aged twenty, she sixty-five or more, and the story about a paper crown being placed in mockery on the severed head of Richard, 3rd Duke of York.

Available at Amazon in eBook and Paperback format.

William Wallace -1305

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. In the month of May of the same year [1297] the Scots, being stirred up by William Wallace, who, as it is said, had until then been a public outlaw, began to rebel. William de Ormesby, Justiciar of Scotland, carrying out the king’s command, condemned many who refused to do homage and fealty to the King of England to exile, and they, choosing the aforesaid William as their leader, and associating with him William Douglas, who had surrendered himself to the king on giving up the castle of Berwick, grew into a great host. The Earl of Surrey and the treasurer being then in England, they planned to overwhelm William the justiciar at Scone, nearly all his goods having been left to the plunder of the enemy, but he, though warned late, scarcely escaped their ambush. William Wallace, therefore, raging openly with his followers against the English, slew whomsoever he could find, and among them he forced religious men, their hands bound behind their backs, to leap into the river, turning their drowning into a spectacle. The king, having heard of this uprising, sent the Bishop of Durham to ascertain the truth, who, having discovered the facts, returned and informed the king of all. The king, having very much at heart his expedition into Flanders, entrusted the whole force beyond the river Trent to the Earl of Warenne, commanding him to suppress the boldness of the Scots as quickly as possible, and to punish the authors of the disturbance with due justice.

Mense Maio ejusdem anni cœperunt Scoti, instigante eos Willelimo Waleys, qui ut fertur hactenus latro publicus fuerat, rebellare. Justitiarius Scotiæ Willeimus de Ormesbi, præceptum regis exsequens, multos, qui regi Angliæ homagium et fidelitatem facere recusabant, exilio condemnavit; qui præfatum Willelmum in principem eligentes, associato sibi Willelmo Duglas, qui reddendo castrum Berewici se regi dederat, in magnam turmam creverunt. Comite autem Surreiæ et thesaurario in Anglia consistentibus, Willeimum justitiarium apud Scone, suis omnibus pæne ad hostium spolia relictis, opprimere cogitabant; sed ille, licet tarde præmunitus, eorum insidias vix evasit. Willelmus Waleys igitur, cum suis palam debacchando in Anglicos, quoscunque invenire potuit, trucidavit: de quibus viros religiosos, ligatis ad dorsum manibus, coegit saltare in fluvium, eorum submersionem in ludibrium convertendo. Rex, hac commotione audita, pro t veritate inquirenda misit Dunelmensem episcopum, qui veritate comperta rediens, regem de omnibus informavit. Rex iter in Flandriam admodum cordi habens, militlam totam ultra fluvium, qui Trenta dicitur, assignavit comiti de Warenna, præcipiens ut Scotorum audaciam celerius reprimeret, et auctores mali debita justitia castigaret.

Click to read more ...

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. He also wrote to John Comyn of Badenoch and to the Earl of Buchan, that, mindful of their fealty, they should return into Scotland and quiet the rising disturbance of their people, who, returning into Scotland in accordance with the command received, carried out the matters of peace sluggishly. The Earl of Warenne, assembling an army in the province of York, sent forward into Scotland his nephew Henry de Percy with the forces of the county of Carlisle, who, advancing as far as the town of Ayr, was preparing to admit the men of Galloway to the king’s peace. But when he heard that the army of the Scots was near Irvine, which was about four miles distant, he went thither and saw beyond a certain lake the army of the Scots encamped, in which the leaders were the Bishop of Glasgow, Andrew of Moray, Steward of Scotland, and William Wallace. A certain valiant knight, named Richard de Lundie, who had never done homage to the King of England, leaving the Scots and becoming a deserter, at once joined himself to the English. The rest, seeking peace, surrendered themselves, their lives and limbs, goods and lands being preserved, so that all things up to that day were simply forgiven. This peace, hostages having been promised and a written agreement drawn up, Henry accepted, provided that it should please the king, who, being consulted on this matter, lest his journey should be hindered, assented to the terms requested. But when the Earl of Warenne had now arrived, and the Scots, by evasion, from day to day delayed to deliver the hostages, and William Wallace in the meantime gathered the people together, the English, thinking themselves betrayed, prepared to attack the Scots, and the Bishop of Glasgow and William Douglas, lest they should incur the charge of treachery, at once surrendered themselves in their own defence, of whom the bishop was committed to custody in the castle of Roxburgh, and William in the castle of Berwick.

Scripsit etiam Joanni Comin de Badenau et comiti de Bowau, ut memores fidelitatis suæ,reverterentur in Scotiam, et populi sui suscitatum jam tumultum sedarent; qui juxta mandatum acceptum in Scotiam revertentes, quæ pacis erant segniter exsequuntur. Comes de Warenna, in provincia Eboraci coadunans exercitum, nepotem suum Henricum de Percy cum militia comitatus Carleoli præmisit in Scotiam; qui usque ad villam de Are profectus, Galwidienses ad pacem regis admittere disponebat. Audito autem quod Scotorum exercitus erat juxta Irwine, quod inde ad quatuor milliaria distabat, illuc profectus vidit ultra quemdam lacum Scotorum exercitum considentem; in quo capitanei erant episcopus Glascuensis, Andreas de Moravia senescallus Scotiæ, et Willelmus Walensis. Miles autem quidam strenuus, nomine Ricardus de Lundi, qui regi Angliæ nunquam homagium fecerat, relictis Scotis factus transfuga, se statim Anglicis sociavit. Reliqui, pacem petentes, dediderunt se, salvis eis vita et membris, catallis et terris, ita ut omnia usque in hunc diem essent simpliciter condonata. Quam pacem, promissis obsidibus, et scripto confecto, admisit Henricus, si tamen hoc regi placeret; qui super hoc consultus, ne a cœpto impediretur itinere, annuit postulata. Adveniente jam comite Warrennæ, cum Scoti tergiversando de die in diem differrent obsides reddere, et Willelmus Waleys interim populum adunaret, arbitrantes se Anglici proditos, dum Scotos invadere disponunt, episcopus Glascuensis et Willeimus Duglas, ne proditionis notam incurrerent, se in sui excusationem protinus dediderunt; de quibus episcopus in castro de Rokesburgia, Willelmus vero in castro Berewici, custodiæ mancipantur.

Click to read more ...

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. At the end of the month of August [1297] the Earl of Warenne, seeing that the promise made by the Scots concerning hostages had come to nothing, and that William Wallace was stirring up the people, and that the magnates were allowing this under pretence, set out from Berwick towards Stirling with an assembled army. There came to the Earl of Warenne the Steward of Scotland and the Earl of Lennox, asking him to remain at rest while they attempted to bring the Scottish people back to the king’s peace. When, however, they made no progress, they returned on the fourth day before the Ides of September [10th September 1297], promising that on the following day they would return to the earl’s aid with forty horse.

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. Now there was a certain notorious outlaw named William Wallace, who for many years had lived as a fugitive. This man, being a wanderer and exile, gathered all other exiles to him and he became, as it were, their leader. Their numbers swelled to a significant force. Also joining him was Sir William Douglas, who had formerly surrendered to our king at the capture of Berwick Castle, on condition that his life and limbs would be spared, as has been stated above. Though the king restored him fully, he showed no gratitude for the favour. Instead, joining with that outlaw, he betrayed his liberator, at least in the persons of his subjects, and pursued them to death. When the aforementioned Earl and Treasurer had gone south to attend the king's parliament, held in London on the Feast of Saint Peter in Chains [1st August [1297]], suspecting no treachery from the Scots, these two Williams (Wallace and Douglas) came with their rebellious followers, hoping to find the king's justice, Lord William de Ormesby, at Scone, where he was holding court, and hurried to kill him. But forewarned, he barely escaped with difficulty, leaving behind a great quantity of goods, which the rebels seized. Now armed with such spoils, the rebels no longer acted in secret as before, but boldly and openly marched forth. They put to the sword all Englishmen they found across Scotland and began laying siege to castles. Meanwhile, as these events unfolded, the Bishop of Carlisle and others who were in the garrison of the city and castle [of Carlisle], fearing the disloyalty and fickleness of Lord Robert Bruce the younger, Earl of Carrick, summoned him to appear on a certain day to discuss the king's affairs, but only if he remained loyal to the king. Bruce, not daring to disobey, came on the appointed day with his followers from Galloway. There, swearing upon the sacred mysteries and on the sword of Saint Thomas [of Becket], he made an oath that he would faithfully aid the king and his men against the Scots and all their enemies, with both advice and support, and that he would hinder the damage they inflicted as far as his power allowed. After swearing this oath, he returned to his own territory and, to create a pretence of loyalty, invaded the lands of the aforementioned William Douglas, setting part of them on fire, and brought Douglas's wife and children with him to Annandale.

Eratque quidam latro publicus, Willelmus Walays nomine, qui mand of the multis temporibus exulaverat. Hic cum esset vagus et profugus omnes exulantes convocavit ad se, et factus est quasi princeps eorum, et creverunt in populum multum. Huic etiam associatus est ille miles Willelmus Duglas, qui in captione castri de Berewyk se cum suis regi nostro dederat, salva sibi vita et membris, ut supradictum est; quem cum rex ad omnia restituisset, factus est bonorum immemor, latro latroni sociatus, liberatorem suum, saltem in subditis, persecutus est in mortem. Cumque prædicti comes et thesaurarius ad partes perrexissent australes, ut parliamento regis interesse possent quod in festo sancti Petri ad Vincula Londoniis tenebatur, nihil mali suspicantes in Scotis, ecce prædicti duo Willelmi cum populo perverso venientes, credebant se invenire posse justitiarium regis nostri prædictum apud Scone, ubi placitaverat, et ut eum perimerent festinabant, ipse tamen præmunitus cum difficultate evasit, relinquens hostibus spolia multa. Quibus collectis, jam non in occulto, ut prius, sed palam processerunt, concludentes in ore gladii omnes Anglicos quos ultra mare Scotia invenire potuerunt, divertentes se postea ad obsidionem castrorum. Interim dum talia gererentur Carliolensis episcopus et cæteri viri qui cum eo erant in præsidio civitatis ejusdem et castri, timentes de infidelitate et inconstantia domini Roberti de Bruys junioris, comitis de Carrik, miserunt vocantes eum, ut certo die veniret tractaturus cum eis de negotiis regis, si tamen in fide ipsius regis perseverando maneret. Qui mandatis resistere non audens, venit ad ipsum diem cum ipso populo Galewaliæ, et super sacrosancta mysteria juravit, et super gladium sancti Thomæ juramentum præstitit, quod regi nostro et suis contra Scotos et omnes inimicos suos fideliter assisteret in consiliis et auxiliis, damnaque sua impediret in quantum se posset sua facultas extendere; factoque juramento, reversus est in locum suum, et congregato populo, ut colorem fingeret, processit in terras prædicti Willelmi Douglas, et partem earum combussit igni, et uxorem ejus et parvulos secum adduxit in Vallem Anandiæ.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. When the Earl of Warenne arrived at Berwick, he was informed in order of the matters mentioned above, and, having sent messengers to the king, sought his will. The king, being on the point of departure, as has been said, did not wish to be hindered, but for the sake of peace granted the requests. Having made a reply to that effect for a fixed day, the Scots were still deliberating in their hearts, delaying the hostages they had promised, and demanding all their rights and ancient customs, as they had been accustomed to hold from the king of Scots in former times. Although these matters had been, as it were, promised with some certain hope of being granted, the days were again and again prolonged, and ever new delays and trivial excuses were added, since that robber William Wallace was gathering the people in the meantime. At last, when our men proposed to ride against them, the magnates of Scotland feared for themselves, and laid the blame on the aforementioned Sir William Douglas and the Bishop of Glasgow, who, wishing to excuse themselves from the charge laid upon them, voluntarily surrendered: first William, and shortly afterward the bishop himself. The bishop was handed over into the custody of the constable of the castle of Roxburgh, in the name and by the authority of our king, while William was placed in the castle of Berwick, where he was kept safe and secure. When that robber William Wallace heard this, he was enraged, and went to the house of the bishop, taking with him all the bishop's furniture, arms, and horses, as well as his sons, called nephews in name, and carried them away. And the number of Scots with him grew enormously, since the common people of the land followed him as their leader and prince. The entire households of the nobles also adhered to him, and although those nobles were bodily present with our king, their hearts were far from him. Now our men, thus provoked and unwilling to endure such things further, marched armed to the town of Stirling. There, the steward of Scotland, the Earl of Lennox, and certain other Scottish magnates came and begged our men to wait a little longer, in case they might be able in some way to pacify their people and the Scots.

Adveniente apud Berewikum comite de Warenna, ei per ordinem prædicta nunciantur, et missis ad regem nunciis, voluntatem ipsius expetiit; qui existens inprocinctu itineris, ut dictum est, noluit impediri, sed pro bono pacis postulata concessit, factoque ad diem certum hujusmodi responso, adhuc disserebant Scoti in cordibus suis, differentes obsides quos promiserant, et postulantes omnia jura sua et antiquas consuetudines, sicut a rege Scotorum antiquitus tenere consueverant. Quæ cum adhuc essent quasi sub certa spe concedenda promissa, iterum et iterum multiplicantur dies, et variantia semper et frivola jungebantur, eo quod ille latro Willelmus Walays interim populum adunabat. Ad ultimum vero, cum nostri proponerent equitare super eos, timebant sibi magnates Scotorum, et imposuerunt culpam prædicto domino Willelmo Duglas et episcopo Glasguensi, qui, notam criminis impositi excusare volentes, sponte dederunt se, primo ille Willelmus et paulo post ipse dominus episcopus; et traditus est episcopus sub custodia custodis castri de Rokesburgh vice et nomine regis nostri, ipse vero Willelmus in castro de Berewyk positus est, retentus, et salvo custoditus. Quod cum audisset ille latro Willelmus Walays, iratus animo perrexit ad domum episcopi, et omnem ejus supellectilem, arma, et equos, filios etiam episcopi nepotum nomine nuncupatos, secum adduxit; et auctus est immenso Scotorum numero, eo quod communitas terræ sequebatur eum tanquam ducem et principem. Tota etiam familia magnatum adhærebat ei, et licet ipsi magnates cum rege nostro essent corpore, cor tamen eorum longe erat ab eo. Nostri vero sic irritati, cum nollent talia ulterius sustinere, processerunt armati ad villam de Strivelyn; ubi senescallus Scotiæ, et comes de Leuenax, et quidam alii magnatum Scotia venientes rogaverunt nostros ut adhuc sustinerent per modicum, si forte suos et populum Scotorum pacificare possent quoquomodo.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. And when they delayed their answer until the next day, that same night they secretly fled, choosing rather to endure whatever great losses temporarily than to break the oath of fealty made to our king and suffer the stigma of infamy. He [Robert Bruce], however, aspiring to the crown, as was openly said, joined himself to the perverse people, and allied with the Bishop of Glasgow and the Steward of Scotland, who had been the chief architects of all this evil. From that time on, that perfidious generation and faithless Scots slaughtered all the English they could find. They even violently dragged English religious men from their monasteries, the very ones in which they had professed their vows, making a public spectacle of them. It was, in fact, a sort of entertainment for them, and they made a show of it: sitting at bridges over many rivers, they would select elderly English monks and women, especially reserved for this cruelty, bind their hands or feet so they could not escape by swimming, and throw them from the bridges or force them to jump, rejoicing at their deaths by drowning. Among those brought to such torment were two canons from the house of St. Andrews in Scotland. While they stood at the bridge of the town called St. John's [Perth], awaiting death before that brigand William Wallace, as though before a tribunal, God suddenly saved them. For messengers arrived in great haste on behalf of certain Scottish nobles. At their arrival, that bandit [Wallace] was interrupted and ordered the canons to be placed under safe guard. Later, they were redeemed by some friends, having given both a ransom and an oath that they would leave the kingdom immediately and never return. One of them stayed with us for a time, and recounted his danger with his own mouth. He also reported that three Englishmen who had taken lodging in the same town of St. Andrews had fled from the face of William Wallace and his followers, and sought refuge at the stone, that is, the stone or needle of St. Andrew, believing they would be protected by the sanctity of the stone, although Holy Mother Church had already lost its privileges there. But they were pursued by the Scots and killed upon that very stone.

Cumque differrent responsionem in crastinum, eadem nocte latenter recesserunt, potius eligentes damna quantumcunque magna ad tempus sustinere, quam fidelitatem regi nostro factam cum nota infamiæ infringere. Ipse vero aspirans ad regnum, sicut publice dicebatur, adjunctus est ad populum perversum, et cum episcopo Glasguensi et senescallo Scotia, qui totius mali fabricatores extiterant, confoederatus est. Extunc vero generatio illa perfida et infideles Scoti omnes Anglicos quos invenire poterant trucidabant. Religiosos etiam viros Anglicos a domibus suis in quibus professi fuerant violenter extraxerunt, ex ipsis spectaculum facientes. Erat enim ludus eorum, et ad spectaculum cum eis vacabant, ad pontes namque aquarum multarum sedentes senes Anglicos religiosos et fœminas quos specialiter reservabant ad hoc, ligatis manibus vel pedibus ne forte natando evaderent, ab ipsis pontibus vel salire vel præcipitari faciebant, in interitu eorum et submersione lætantes. Inter quos adducti sunt duo canonici de domo Sancti Andreæ in Scotia, qui cum ad pontem villæ nominata Sancti Johannis coram illo latrone Willelmo Walays starent quasi pro tribunali mortem expectantes, subito salvavit eos Deus sic. Venerunt enim nuncii cum festinatione maxima ex parte quorundam magnatum regni Scotia, in quorum adventu præpeditus ille latro, præcepit ut in salva custodia ponerentur; qui postea a custodibus suis per quosdam amicorum redempti sunt, dato pretio et præstito juramento quod a regno festinanter egressi nunquam illud iterum ingrederentur. Quorum unus mansit apud nos per tempus aliquod, et periculum suum ore proprio enarravit; retulit etiam nobis quod tres Anglici, qui in eadem villa Sancti Andreæ in Scotia mansionem susceperant, cum a facie illius Willelmi Walays et suorum fugissent in lapidem illum scilicet qui dicitur petra vel acus sancti Andreæ, credentes se posse lapidis immunitate muniri cum sancta mater ecclesia privilegium perdidisset, a Scotis insecuti sunt et in eodem lapide interfecti.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. In the morning [of 10th September 1297], more than five thousand of our foot soldiers and many Welsh crossed the bridge and then returned again because our earl, still overcome by sleep, had not yet come to the field. When he finally rose late in the day and found all armed in the field, he knighted some new men, some of whom fell in battle that very day. Meanwhile, our foot soldiers crossed again and returned once more because the Steward of Scotland and the Earl of Lennox came with only a few men, not with sixty armed horsemen as agreed. Our men believed they were bringing good news, but they instead excused themselves, both for the prior assault and for being unable to control their own people, saying they could not take away their arms or horses. At the same time, two Dominican friars were sent to the Scottish army, which was hiding on the other side of the mountain above the monastery of Cambuskenneth, along with the robber William Wallace, to see if they would accept peace. To this the robber replied: "Tell your men that we have not come for the sake of peace, but are ready for battle, to avenge ourselves and free our kingdom! Let them come up when they please, they will find us ready, even in their very beards." It was said that their force consisted of 180 cavalry and 40,000 foot soldiers.

Mane autem facto, transierunt pontem pedestres nostri plusquam quinque millia et Wallenses plures, iterumque revertebantur eo quod comes noster somno depressus in campum non exisset. Cumque post magnam horam surrexisset a somno, essentque omnes in campo armati, fecit ibidem novos milites, quorum quidam eadem die corruerunt. Interimque transierunt pedestres nostri, et iterato reversi sunt eo quod senescallus Scotia et comes de Levenax veniebant cum paucis quidem et non cum LX armatis ut convenerant, credebantque nostri ipsos fore bajulos boni nuncii, sed excusaverunt se et in facto prædicto et quod gentem propriam justificare non possent, dicentes se non posse ab eis eripere nec equos nec arma. Mittebantur etiam interim duo fratres Prædicatores ad exercitum Scotorum, qui in altera parte montis supra monasterium de Skambskynel cum illo latrone Willelmo Walays latitabat, si forte pacem amplecti vellent quam tendebant. Ad hæc ille latro, "Renunciate," inquit, "vestris quod pro bono pacis non venimus, sed parati sumus ad pugnam, ad vindicandum scilicet nos et liberandum regnum nostrum! Ascendant ergo cum voluerint, et nos paratos invenient etiam in barbas eorum." Erant autem, ut dicebatur, centum octoginta equestres, et quadraginta millia peditum.

Click to read more ...

On 11th September 1297 the combined forces of Andrew Moray and William Wallace defeated the forces of John Warenne 6th Earl of Surrey [aged 66] near Stirling Bridge. After around half the English had crossed the narrow bridge the Scots attacked subjecting the English to a significant defeat.

Lanercost Chronicle. 11th September 1297. When this had been done and the greater part of the army had been dismissed, the Steward brought them to the bridge of Stirling, where on the other side of the water the army of Scotland was posted. They [the Scots] allowed as many of the English to cross the bridge as they could hope to overcome, and then, having blocked the bridge1, they slaughtered all who had crossed over, among whom perished the Treasurer of England, Hugh de Cressingham, of whose skin William Wallace caused a broad strip to be taken from the head to the heel, to make therewith a baldrick for his sword1. The Earl of Warenne escaped with difficulty and with a small following, so hotly did the enemy pursue them. After this the Scots entered Berwick and put to death the few English that they found therein; for the town was then without walls, and might be taken as easily by English or Scots coming in force. The castle of the town, however, was not surrendered on this occasion.

Note 1. Ponte obturato i.e. with the bridge blocked.

Note 2. Other writers say the skin was cut up into horse-girths.

Scalacronica. 11th September 1297. And the following winter, the said William Wallace burnt all Northumberland. The Earl of Warenne [aged 66], who was Keeper of Scotland for the King of England, being in the south1, turned towards Scotland; where at the bridge of Stirling he was defeated by William Wallace, who, being at hand in order of battle2, allowed so many of the English as he pleased to cross over the said bridge, and, at the right moment3, attacked them, caused the bridge to be broken, where many of the English perished, with Hugh de Cressingham, the King's Treasurer; and it was said that the Scots caused him to be flayed, and in token of hatred made girths of his skin. The Earl of Warenne took flight to Berwick. William Wallace, to whom the Scots adhered, immediately after this discomfiture, followed4 the said Earl of Warenne in great force, and skirting Berwick, arrived on Hutton Moor in order of battle; but perceiving the English arrayed to oppose him, he came no nearer to Berwick, but retired and bivouacked in Duns Park5.

Note 1. Warenne, or Surrey, which was his principal title, had been recalled on 18th August for service with King Edward on the Continent, and Sir Brian Fitz Alan was appointed Keeper of Scotland in his place. But Sir Brian having raised a difficulty about his salary (£1128 8s.), the Prince of Wales wrote on 7th Sept., 1298, requiring Surrey to remain at his post. (See Stevenson's Documents illustrative of the History of Scotland, ii. 230.)

Note 2. En batailA soun point. i.e., in force or in order of battle; used in both senses.

Note 3. A soun point. i.e.

Note 4. Suyst, misprinted fuyst in Maitland Club Ed.

Note 5. Not Duns Park on Whitadder, but in a place which then bore that name a little to the north of Berwick.

Click to read more ...

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. On that day [11th September 1297] envoys were sent to William Wallace and the Scots who were with him, inviting them to the king’s peace and promising them immunity for past actions. They replied that they had come for battle, not for peace. Richard de Lundie advising that the English should not cross the bridge, because they could not advance together in any number, but only two or three at most at a time, nevertheless, others urging it, the guardian decided that they should cross by the bridge. And behold, before half the army had crossed, the multitude of the Scots came upon them, and, engaging with those who had already crossed, slew almost all who had passed over. Among the few who escaped was Marmaduke de Thweng, who with great valour held the bridge so that he might return safely. The Guardian of Scotland fled as far as Berwick, committing the custody of the castle of Stirling to Marmaduke. The Steward of Scotland and the Earl of Lennox, seeing that the English had been overthrown, went over to the Scots. In this battle there fell Hugh de Cressingham, Treasurer of Scotland, whom the Scots, out of particular hatred, flayed, and divided his skin into pieces. The Guardian of Scotland fled from Berwick into England, going to the king’s son, and after him fled the other English who were in Berwick, leaving the town empty to the Scots, but the keepers of the castle, holding it, defended it bravely.

Exeunte vero mense Augusto comes Warenniæ, cum promissionem factam a Scotis de obsidibus videret decidere in nihilum, Willelmumque Waleis populum commoventem, et magnates sub dissimulatione ista permittentes, de Berewico progreditur versus Strivelin exercitu adunato; ubi venerunt ad comitem Warenniæ senescallus Scotiæ et comes de Lewenes, rogantes ut quiesceret, dum ipsi populum Scotorum ad pacem regis reducere attentarent. Cum autem non proficerent, redierunt quarto idus Septembris, se cum quadraginta equis in comitis adjutorium redituros in crastino promittentes. Quo die missi sunt nuntii ad Willelmum Waleis et Scotos qui cum eo erant, invitantes eos ad pacem regis, et pro retroactis impunitatem spondentes. Qui responderunt, Se ad pugnam, non ad pacem venisse.: Dissuadente autem Ricardo de Lundi ne Anglici pontem transirent, quia non possent simul in multitudine aliqua progredi, sed tantum bini vel terni ad plus; nihilominus tamen suadentibus aliis, elegit custos, ut per pontem transirent. Et ecce, antequam transiret exercitus medietas, supervenit Scotorum multitudo, et cum his qui jam transierant, congressa, pæne omnes qui transierant peremerunt. Inter paucos qui evaserunt fuit Marmeducus de Tuenge, qui in magna virtute obtinuit pontem, ut salvus rediret. Custos Scotiæ usque Berewicum fugiens, castri de Strivelin commisit custodiam Marmeduco. Senescallus Scotiæ et comes de Lewenes, videntes Anglicos corruisse, transfugerunt ad Scotos. Cecidit in hoc prælio Hugo de Cresingham, thesaurarius Scotiæ, quem Scoti ob odium speciale excoriantes, pellem ejus in particulas diviserunt. Custos Scotiæ de Berewico fugit in Angliam, adiens filium regis; fugeruntque post eum et ceteri Anglici, qui in Berewico erant, villam Scotis vacuam relinquentes. Custodes tamen castri illud tenentes viriliter defenderunt.

Click to read more ...

John of Fordun's Annals of the Scottish Nation. 11th September 1297. 99. Battle of Stirling Bridge

In the year 1297, the fame of William Wallace was spread all abroad, and, at length, reached the ears of the king of England; for the loss brought upon his people was crying out. As the king, however, was intent upon many troublesome matters elsewhere, he sent his treasurer, named Hugh of Clissingham, with a large force to repress this William's boldness, and to bring the kingdom of Scotland under his sway. When, therefore, he heard of this man's arrival, the aforesaid William, then busy besieging the English who were in Dundee Castle, straightway intrusted the care and charge of the siege of the castle to the burgesses of that town, on pain of loss of life and limb, and, with his army, marched on, with all haste, towards Strivelyn (Stirling), to meet this Hugh. A battle was then fought, on the 11th of September, near Strivelyn (Stirling), at the bridge over the Forth. Hugh of Clissingham was killed, and all his army put to flight: some of them were slain with the sword, others taken, others drowned in the waters. But, through God, they were all overcome; and the aforesaid William gained a happy victory, with no little praise. Of the nobles, on his side, the noble Andrew of Moray alone, the father of Andrew, fell wounded.

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. Andrew of Moray and William Wallace, commanders of the army of the Kingdom of Scotland, in the name of the renowned prince Lord John, by the grace of God illustrious King of Scotland, by the consent of the community of the same kingdom, to all men of the said kingdom to whom the present letters may come, greeting. Know that we, in the name of the said king, have lawfully received into the firm peace and protection of the same lord king and of ourselves the prior and convent of Hexham in Northumbria, their lands, their people, and all their possessions, both movable and immovable goods. Wherefore we strictly forbid anyone from presuming to do them harm, molestation, injury, or any grievance to their persons, lands, or goods, under full penalty of forfeiture to the said lord king, or to inflict death on them or any of them, under penalty of loss of life and limbs. Let it be known that these present letters shall no longer be valid after one year. Given at Hexham on the 7th day of November [1297], Thursday.

Andreas de Moravia et Willelmus Wallensis, duces exercitus regni Scotia, nomine præclari principis domini Johannis, Dei gratia regis Scotia illustris, de consensu communitatis regni ejusdem, omnibus hominibus dicti regni ad quos præsentes literæ pervenerint, salutem. Sciatis nos nomine dicti regis, priorem et conventum de Hexhildesham in Northumbria, terras suas, homines suos, et universas eorum possessiones, ac omnia bona sua mobilia et immobilia, sub firma pace et protectione ipsius domini regis et nostra juste suscepisse. Quare firmiter prohibemus ne quis eis in personis, terris seu rebus malum, molestiam, injuriam seu gravamen aliquod inferre præsumat, super plenaria forisfactura ipsius domini regis, aut mortem eis vel alicui eorum inferat, sub pœna amissionis vitæ et membrorum. Præsentibus post annum minime valituris. Datum apud Hexhildesham VII die Thursday, Novembris.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. So the Scots, returning from the aforementioned slaughter, came to Hexham [after 11th November 1297], where three canons of that house at Hexham, who had only recently returned, fearing not death, fled into their oratory which they had newly built, intending, if it were God's will, to become a sacrifice, an offering of sweet fragrance to Him. Soon, however, armed men entered, shaking their lances at them and saying, 'Show us the treasures of your church, or you shall immediately die.' To this, one of the canons replied, 'Not long ago, you and your people carried off nearly everything of ours into your land, and you know where you stored it. Since then we have gathered only a few things, as you now see before you.' In the meantime, their leader, William Wallace, entered and rebuked his men, commanding them to withdraw. He also requested that one of the canons celebrate Mass. One of them immediately did so. And when the elevation [of the Host] was performed, William went out to lay down his arms. But it happened that when the priest came to receive the most holy Body and Blood of Christ, many of the Scots surrounded him in an attempt to seize the chalice. And while the priest was washing his hands and returning from the sacristy to the altar, he found that the chalice, which he had placed upon the altar, had been taken away, along with the manuterge [hand towel] and the other ornaments of the altar. Nor did he have a missal in which to complete the Mass he had begun, since everything had been carried off. And as the priest hesitated, uncertain what should be done, William [Wallace] returned and, seeing what had happened, commanded that the sacrilegious thieves be sought out and punished with death. But they were not found, as the search was carried out with deliberate negligence. And he said to the canons: 'Do not leave my side, but remain with me so that you may be kept safe; for this people is malicious and cannot be justified or restrained.' He remained there for two days, and that wicked mob dispersed throughout the surrounding province, burning and laying waste to everything.

Revertentes ergo Scoti a cæde prædicta venerunt ad Hexcelsham, ubi tres canonici ejusdem Hexham domus qui paulo ante redierant, mortem non pillaged. timentes, cum vidissent venientem exercitum fugerunt in oratorium suum quod de novo construxerant, ut si sic esset divina voluntas sacrificium sibi fierent in odorem suavitatis. Moxque ingressi sunt ad eos viri lancearii vibrantes eis lanceas et dicentes, Ostendite nobis thesauros ecclesiæ vestræ, vel confestim moriemini. Ad hæc unus de canonicis, Non, inquit, diu est quod vos et populus vester omnia quasi nostra asportastis in terram vestram, et ubi reposuistis ea scitis, nos vero extunc pauca quæsivimus, sicut jam in præsenti videtis. Interim vero dux eorum ingressus est, scilicet Willelmus Walays, et comminabatur suis ut recederent, rogavitque ut eorum aliquis missam celebraret, et statim celebravit unus. Factaque elevatione, egressus est ille Willelmus ad deponendum arma sua, et factum est cum perveniret sacerdos ad perceptionem sacratissimi corporis et sanguinis Christi, circumsteterunt eum Scoti multi ut calicem abriperent.

Dumque manus ablueret, et a sacrario reverteretur altari, invenit calicem asportatum quem super altare reclinaverat, manutergiaque et cætera ornamenta ipsius altaris nec erat ei liber in quo finiret missam incœptam, eo quod asportaverant omnia. Et cum hæsitaret sacerdos quid esset faciendum, reversus est ille Willelmus, et vidit hæc, præcepitque ut quærerentur sacrilegi et capite plecterentur. Sed inventi non sunt, utpote cum dissimulatione quæsiti. Adjecitque ad canonicos, "Non," inquit, "a me recedatis quoquam, sed mecum maneatis ut salvemini; populus enim iste malitiosus est, nec justificari potest seu castigari." Mansitque ibidem per duos dies, et populus ille perversus dispersus est per circumadjacentem provinciam, comburens incendio et vastans universa.

Click to read more ...

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. After this, a rising was stirred up at Ghent by the sons of the Count of Flanders and the townsmen against the English, whose town would have been burned by the Welsh, had not the king, the count running to him, checked the attack. The Earl of Warenne, guardian of Scotland, and the other earls, assembling at York according to the king’s command, on the octave of Saint Hilary [21st January 1298], after the confirmation of the charters and the articles added had been published, proceeded towards Scotland. The leading men of Scotland, not coming to York according to the royal summons, kept themselves within the bounds of their own land. William Wallace had for many days been besieging the castle of Roxburgh, but, on hearing of the arrival of the English in great force, he fled. The earls, coming to Roxburgh, having strengthened the castle and comforted those who had been besieged, advanced as far as Kelso, and thence returned as far as Berwick, which they found already deserted by the Scots. While they were staying there, the king sent word to them of the truces accepted and of his speedy return, commanding them that, before his arrival, except for the occupation of Berwick, they should attempt nothing whereby they might be exposed to danger. Accordingly, the greater part of the army having been dismissed, and those retained who might suffice for holding the town, they awaited the king’s arrival. About the beginning of Lent, Robert de Clifford, with those who were in garrison at Carlisle, entered Scotland, burned the town of Annandale, and returned with much plunder. Then, when the King of England, about to return to his own realm, had come to the town called Ardres, almost all the Scots whom he had taken with him into Flanders on the expedition withdrew from him and went to Paris.

Suscitata est post hæc apud Gandavum seditio per filios comitis Flandriæ et villanos contra Anglicos; quorum villa per Wallenses incensa fuisset, nisi rex accurrente ad eum comite impetum impedisset. Comes Warennæ custos Scotiæ ac comites alii, juxta mandatum regium Eboracum convenientes, in octavis S. Hilarii, publicata confirmatione chartarum articulorumque adjectorum, versus Scotiam processerunt. Majores Scotorum Eboracum non venientes secundum vocationem regiam, se infra terræ suæ terminos tenuerunt. Willelmus Waleis castrum de Rokesburgia jam diebus multis obsederat, sed audito adventu Anglicoruam in multitudine magna diffugit. Comites venientes Rokesburgiam, munito castro ac consolatis obsessis, digressi sunt usque Kelston; et inde reversi sunt usque Berewicum, quam jam Scotis vacuam invenerunt. Dumque ibi morarentur, mandavit eis rex de treugis acceptis et reditu suo celeri, jubens ne ante adventum suum, excepta occupatione Berewici, aliquid quo paterent discrimini attentarent. Remissa igitur majori parte exercitus, et retentis qui ad detentionem villæ possent sufficere, adventum regium exspectabant. Circa principium Quadragesimæ Robertus de Clifford, cum his qui erant in præsidio Carleoli, Scotiam ingressus, villa Anandiæ combusta, rediit cum præda multa. Deinde cum rex Angliæ, reversurus ad propria, venisset ad villam quæ Ardeburgia dicitur, Scoti fere omnes, quos secum Flandriam duxerat in expeditionem, ab ipso rege discedentes, Parisios abierunt.

Click to read more ...

On 22nd July 1298 King Edward I of England [aged 59] defeated the Scottish army led by William Wallace during the 22nd July 1298 Battle of Falkirk at Falkirk [Map] using archers to firstly attack the Scottish shiltrons with the heavy cavalry with infantry completing the defeat.

John de Graham [aged 31] and John Stewart of Bonkyll [aged 52] were killed.

The English were described in the Falkirk Roll that lists 111 men with their armorials including:

Guy Beauchamp 10th Earl Warwick [aged 26].

Walter Beauchamp [aged 55].

Roger Bigod 5th Earl Norfolk [aged 53].

Humphrey Bohun 3rd Earl Hereford 2nd Earl Essex [aged 49].

Robert Clifford 1st Baron Clifford [aged 24].

Hugh "Elder" Despencer 1st Earl Winchester [aged 37].

William Ferrers 1st Baron Ferrers of Groby [aged 26].

Thomas Berkeley 6th and 1st Baron Berkeley [aged 52].

Maurice Berkeley 7th and 2nd Baron Berkeley [aged 27].

Henry Grey 1st Baron Grey of Codnor [aged 43].

Reginald Grey 1st Baron Grey of Wilton [aged 58].

John Grey 2nd Baron Grey of Wilton [aged 30].

John Mohun 1st Baron Dunster [aged 29].

Simon Montagu 1st Baron Montagu [aged 48].

William Ros 1st Baron Ros Helmsley [aged 43].

John Segrave 2nd Baron Segrave [aged 42].

Nicholas Segrave [aged 42].

Robert de Vere 6th Earl of Oxford [aged 41].

Alan Zouche 1st Baron Zouche Ashby [aged 30].

Thomas Plantagenet 2nd Earl of Leicester, 2nd Earl Lancaster, Earl of Salisbury and Lincoln [aged 20].

Henry Plantagenet 3rd Earl of Leicester 3rd Earl Lancaster [aged 17].

John Warenne 6th Earl of Surrey [aged 67].

Henry Percy 9th and 1st Baron Percy [aged 25].

Hugh Courtenay 1st or 9th Earl Devon [aged 21].

Richard Fitzalan 1st or 8th Earl of Arundel [aged 31].

Henry Beaumont Earl Buchan [aged 19].

John II Duke Brittany [aged 59].

Philip Darcy [aged 40].

Robert Fitzroger.

Robert Fitzwalter 1st Baron Fitzwalter [aged 51], or possiby a Roger Fitzwalter?.

Simon Fraser.

Aymer de Valence 2nd Earl Pembroke [aged 23].

John Wake 1st Baron Wake of Liddell [aged 30], and.

Henry Lacy 4th Earl Lincoln, Earl Salisbury [aged 47].

William Scrope [aged 53] was knighted.

John Moels 1st Baron Moels [aged 29] fought.

John Lovell 1st Baron Lovel [aged 44] fought.

Click to read more ...

Annales of Angliae and Scotiae. How King Edward prepared himself against the Scots

In the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1298, which was the twenty-sixth year of the reign of King Edward, that same king prepared himself, not with a feeble company, but with a mighty host of warriors, to crush the audacity of the Scots. At Easter of that year, he arrived with all his strength at Berwick. He entered the town without resistance, for the Scots had fled, struck with great terror upon hearing of the king's approach. He then pursued them, and on the next feast of Saint Mary Magdalene he engaged them in battle at Falkirk 22nd July 1298. There he inflicted upon his enemies such a great slaughter that the living could not bury the dead; reportedly nearly one hundred thousand.

How William Wallace arranged his army for battle

William Wallace had constructed a barrier between his army and the English: he fixed long and substantial stakes into the ground and bound them together with ropes and cords, forming a sort of hedge, in order to hinder the charge and advance of the English. Then, having summoned his companies, he forced all the foot soldiers to enter into the front line, saying to them in his native tongue: 'They have put you into a game—hop, if you can,' as if to say, 'I have now led you into a pit and the peril of danger; leap back, if you can, in order to save yourself.'

He himself, not as a prince but as a deceiver, fled. For an army without a leader, and ignorant of military discipline, either falls apart before the battle or is easily defeated in the very conflict. Great value in war lies in the presence of a commander, in proven boldness in such matters, in experience, and above all in discipline. Deprived of these things, as I have said, William le Wallace was therefore of no worth—he misled the people. For it is easier to make a hawk out of a kite than to make a learned man out of a peasant in an instant; and one who tries to pour deep knowledge into him does as much good as one who scatters pearls before swine.

But when the king saw such a great multitude of unarmed foot soldiers—indeed, the Scots were three times more numerous than the English, but advanced without order or proper arms, he immediately commanded the Welsh, who had come with the king, nearly ten thousand in number, to attack the Scots. But they refused and scattered at once, not yet having harmed the Scots, as they had premeditated deceit; for they still remembered the slaughter of their kinsmen, which the same king had inflicted the previous year, and they deeply hated him for it. Thus, at that time, the English suspected that if the king were to suffer the worse side of the battle, the Welsh might seize the moment to take revenge. And indeed, if permission or opportunity had been granted, the Welsh, stirred by such grievances, would have attempted to exact vengeance. But while they plotted such things, divine mercy restrained them, for God does not abandon those who hope in Him.

Then, upon realizing the treachery of the Welsh, a certain Englishman addressed the king as follows:

'King Edward, if you trust the Welsh, you are mistaken,

As you once did before; now strip their lands.'

The Welsh, however, delayed attacking the Scots until, the king having triumphed, the Scots were falling on all sides—like the blossoms of trees when the fruit begins to ripen. Then the king said: 'The Lord is with us—who can be against us?' Immediately the Welsh charged upon the Scots, cutting them down so completely that the ground was covered with their corpses, as if with snow in winter. In that battle, nearly one hundred thousand Scots fell, mostly from the poor common folk. Thus did God grant the fortune of battle to those who believed in Him, and unerring destruction to those who scorned Him.

Thus King Edward, the Third, became a most glorious victor. When William Wallace and the chief leaders of Scotland saw that they could no longer resist the King of England, and that such a slaughter had befallen their people, they said to one another, 'Let us withdraw from here, for God is not with us.' Immediately, driven by fear, they fled and hid themselves in towns, in the woods, and in any place they believed might offer safe refuge. The women, taking their children and household belongings, escaped by way of the coast. Having prepared ships, they even took to the sea, setting sail wherever fate might lead them. But when they had unfurled their sails, contrary winds suddenly rose, scattered their ships, and in the blink of an eye they perished in the depths of the sea.

Quomodo Rex Edwardus paravit se contra Scotos.

Anno ab Incarnatione Domini millesimo ducentesimo nonagesimo octavo, qui est annus regni Regis Edwardi vicesimus sextus, idem Rex se paraverat non inerti cohorte virorum bellatorum, ut audaciam Scotorum Scots opprimeret. Eodem tempore Paschali apud Berwicum, cum tota fortitudine sua, applicuit. Mox intravit, absque obstaculo; quia Scoti fugerant, audito Regis adventu, nimio terrore perculsi. Deinde prosecutus est eos, et in festo Mariæ Magdalenæ proximo sequenti commisit helium apud Faukurke. Ibi maximam stragem hostium suorum commisit, quam non poterant vivi humare, videlicet, fere centum millia.

Quomodo Willelmus le Waleis ordinavit exercitum suum in bello.

Willemus le Waleis construxerat sepem inter exercitum suum et Anglicanos; longos palos, et non modicos, in terram fixit, et cum funibus et cordis illaqueavit, ad modum sepis, ut congressum et egressum Anglicanorum impediret. Deinde convocatis catervis suis, omnem populum pedestrem in primo concursu compellebat intrare, dicens illis patria lingua: 'Hy haue pult ou into a gamen, hoppet yif ye kunnet,' —quasi dicat, '—Jam introduxi vos in foveam et periculi discrimen, resilite, si poteris, ut salvemini.'

Ipse autem, non ut princeps, sed ut seductor, aufugit. Nam exercitus, principe carens, et discipline militaris ignarus, aut ante congressionem dilabitur, aut in ipso conflictu facile decidet. Valet multum in bellis ducis presentia, valet spectata in talibus audacia, valet usus, et maxime disciplina. Quibus, ut dixi, carens Willelmus le Waleis, et, per consequens, nihil valens, sed populum seducens, — nam facilius est accipitrem ex milvo fieri, quam ex rustico subito eruditum et qui profundam doctrinam ei infundit, idem facit aesi margaritas inter porcos spargit.

Distulerunt tamen Walenses ne Scotos expugnarent, donec, Rege triumphante, Scoti undique corruerent, quomodo flores arborum, maturescente fructu. Tunc ait Rex, — "Dominus nobiscum, quis contra nos?" Statim Walenses irruerunt in Scotos, eos prostemendo, in tantum, ut terrm operirent cadavera eorum, tanquam nix in hyeme. Ceciderunt in illo bello de Scotis fere centum millia, de paupere vulgo. Concessit ergo Deus fortunam belli se credentibus, et inerrabilem contritionem se contemnentibus.

Rex autem, cum vidisset tantam multitudinem populi pedestris et inermis, — erant enim in triplo plures Scoti quam Angli, sed sine ordine et armis incedentes, — statim Rex jussit Walensibus, qui cum Rege venerant, fere ad decern millia, ut Scotos expugnarent. Qui nolentes, sed continuo diffugerunt, necdum Scotis nocuerunt, dolum prsemeditantes; semper enim necis parentum suorum memores, quam idem Rex anno elapso intulerat, seterao ilium habebant odio. Unde tunc temporis suspicabatur ab Anglicis, quod si Rex deteriorem partem belli pateretur. Quibus etiam nugis Walenses incitati, si fas libito concessisset, vindictam sumere niterentur. Mox illis talia præmeditantibus, compescuit eos miseratio divina, qui non derelinquit sperantes in se.

Deinde cognita malitia Walensium, quidam Anglicanus sic Regem affatur:

"Rex Edwarde, fidem si des Walensibus, erras,

"Ut dederas pridem$1 sed eorum diripe terras."

Rex itaque Edwardus Tertius victor clarissimus extitit: Wilelmus Waleis et majores Scotiæ, cum vidissent se Regi Anglim minime resistere, et tantam stragem populo suo accidisse, mutuo dixerunt,— "Recedamus hinc, non enim est Deus nobiscum." Continuo, cogente timore, fugerunt, et ad oppida et nemora, et ad omnem locum ubi tutum putabant refugium, delituerunt. Mulieres vero, acceptis parvulis suis et supellectilibus, per partes maritimas evaserunt. Parato navigio, etiam ingrediuntur mare, tendentes quo sors illas conduceret. Demum cum vela pretendissent, insurrexerunt venti contrarii, et navigia eorum dissipaverunt, et in ictu oculi infra maria periclitaverunt.

Click to read more ...

John of Fordun's Annals of the Scottish Nation. Battle of Falkirk

In the year 1298, the aforesaid king of England, taking it ill that he and his should be put to so much loss and driven to such straits by William Wallace, gathered together a large army, and, having with him, in his company, some of the nobles of Scotland to help him, invaded Scotland. He was met by the aforesaid William, with the rest of the magnates of that kingdom; and a desperate battle was fought near Falkirk, on the 22d of July [1298]. William was put to flight, not without serious loss both to the lords and to the common people of the Scottish nation. For, on account of the ill-will, begotten of the spring of envy, which the Comyns had conceived towards the said William, they, with their accomplices, forsook the field, and escaped unhurt. On learning their spiteful deed, the aforesaid William, wishing to save himself and his, hastened to flee by another road. But alas! through the pride and burning envy of both, the noble Estates (communitas) of Scotland lay wretchedly overthrown throughout hill and dale, mountain and plain. Among these, of the nobles, John Stewart, with his Brendans; Macduff, of Fife; and the inhabitants thereof, were utterly cut off. But it is commonly said that Robert of Bruce, who was afterwards king of Scotland, but then fought on the side of the king of England, was the means of bringing about this victory. For, while the Scots stood invincible in their ranks, and could not be broken by either force or stratagem, this Robert of Bruce went with one line, under Anthony of Bek, by a long road round a hill, and attacked the Scots in the rear; and thus these, who had stood invincible and impenetrable in front, were craftily overcome in the rear. And it is remarkable that we seldom, if ever, read of the Scots being overcome by the English, unless through the envy of lords, or the treachery and deceit of the natives, taking them over to the other side.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of William Rishanger. 22nd July 1298. The king, therefore, having given the signal for battle to the first division, boldly charged into the Scots and broke through their defensive line. Thus the two armies engaged; but as the Scottish cavalry fled immediately, the English pursued them, cutting them down and inflicting great slaughter so that the number of Scots who fell in this battle was estimated to have exceeded sixty thousand. At the beginning of the battle, the Master of the Knights Templar in England, along with his companion, the Master of the Templars in Scotland, plunged into the Scottish host before the others and, overwhelmed by the multitude of the enemy, were killed. William Wallace and the chief leaders of Scotland fled from the battlefield into the woods.

Rex ergo, dato signo prœlii primæ cohorti, irruit in Scotos audacter, sepemque dirumpit. Congrediuntur igitur ambo exercitus; sed fugientibus statim Scotorum equitibus, Anglici insequuntur, cædentes et stragem magnam ingerentes; ut eorum qui ceciderant de Scotis in hoc prælio numerus æstimetur sexaginta millia excessisse. In principio autem prælii, Præceptor Militiæ Templi in Anglia, et socius ejus, qui erat Præceptor Scotiæ, Scotorum agmini se immiscentes, ante alios The Scots oppressi, oppressorum multitudine sunt perempti. Willelmus Waleys et majores Scotiæ ab hoc prælio ad nemora confugerunt.

Scalacronica. The said English lords recovered the said town of Berwick, and held it until the arrival of the King, who, returning from Gascony, approached Scotland in great force, entered it by Roxburgh, advanced to Templeliston and Linlithgow, and so towards Stirling, where William Wallace, who had mustered all the power of Scotland, lay in wait and undertook to give battle to the said King of England. They fought on this side of Falkirk on the day of the Magdalene [22nd July] in the year of grace 1298, when the Scots were defeated. Wherefore it was said long after that William Wallace had brought them to the revel if they would have danced.

Walter, brother of the Steward of Scotland, who had dismounted [to fight] on foot among the commons, was slain with more than ten thousand of the commons.1 William Wallace, who was on horseback, fled with the other Scottish lords who were present. At this battle, Antony de Bek, Bishop of Durham, who was with King Edward of England, had such abundance of retinue that in his column there were thirty-two banners and a trio of earls — the Earl of Warwick [aged 26], the Earl of Oxford [aged 41], and the Earl of Angus [aged 53].

Note 1. It was Sir John Stewart of Bonkill [aged 52] who was thus slain, at the head of his Selkirk bowmen. Gray's estimate of the slain is more reasonable than that of clerical writers. Walsingham puts the number at 60,000, probably three times as much as Wallace's whole force: Hemingburgh reduces it to 56,000.

Lanercost Chronicle. 22nd July 1298. But on the feast of blessed Mary Magdalene, the Scots encountered him at Falkirk with all their strength, their leader being the aforementioned William Wallace. They placed great confidence, as was their custom, in their infantry of spearmen, whom they positioned in the front line. However, the English cavalry, who composed the majority of the army, surrounded them on all sides and charged through them; and when all the Scottish cavalry quickly fled, there were killed among the standing and bravely fighting spearmen and foot soldiers sixty thousand, according to some; eighty thousand, according to others; and according to others, one hundred thousand. No nobleman from the English side was killed, except for the Master of the Templars with five or six squires, who had penetrated too deeply and recklessly into the Scottish wedge formation. With the enemies of the king and kingdom thus defeated, the English army proceeded by one route to the Scottish sea and returned by another, destroying those things the Scots had previously abandoned. But when winter drew near, the king dismissed the English nobles to return to their own lands, and he himself, with a few men, guarded the March for a time. Yet before Christmas, he returned to the southern parts, having left a garrison in the aforesaid March.

In festo autem beatæ Mariæ Magdalene occurrerunt ei Scotti apud Faukirk cum toto robore suo, duce eorum Willelmo Waleis superius nominato, confidentes maxime, more solito, in peditibus lanceariis, quos in prima acie pofuerunt. Equites autem armat: Angliæ, quorum erat maxima pars exercitus, circuentes undique transvolverunt eos, et fugientibus cito omnibus equitibus Scotiæ, interfecti sunt de lanceariis et peditibus stantibus et viriliter agentibus sexaginta mille, secundum alios octaginta mille, secundum alios centum mille; nec fuit aliquis nobilis homo ex parte Angliæ interfectus nisi magister Templariorum cum quinque vel sex armigeris, qui nimis valde et inconsiderate penetraverat cuneum Scotticorum. Devictis autem sic inimicis regis et regni, processit exercitus Angliæ per unam viam ad mare Scoticanum et rediit per aliam, destruendo ea quæ Scotti ante dimisserant. Hyeme vero ingruente, dimisit rex magnates Angliæ redire ad propria, et ipsemet cum paucis Marchiam custodivit ad tempus. Sed ante Natale Domini rediit ad partes australes, dimissa custodia in Marchia supradicta.

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of the Monastery of Melsa. 22nd July 1298. The Scots, for their part, likewise planned to meet the king with all their forces. And so a battle was fought on the feast of Saint Mary Magdalene, in the year of our Lord 1298, and twenty-two thousand Scots were slain at Falkirk primarily because the leader of the Scots, William Wallace, and the other magnates of Scotland, upon seeing the banner of Edward, King of the English, abandoned their army, leaving it without a head; and thus it was almost entirely destroyed. Of the English army, only one notable man fell, Brian de Jay, Master of the Knights Templar in England, who, in pursuing William Wallace, was slain. Afterward, King Edward, leaving behind forces to suppress the stubbornness of the remaining Scots, returned to England. Nevertheless, the Scots, gradually regaining strength over the next thirty years, frequently overran the English and their borders, until the time of King Edward the Third after the Conquest, as shall be told later. This misfortune was attributed by some to the treachery and effeminacy of the English, in accordance with that prophecy made in the time of King Æthelred, which foretold that the English people would be destroyed by the Danes, the French, and the Scots.

Scotti quoque e contra cum exercitu totis viribus eidem occurrere proponebant. Factus est ergo congressus exercituum in die Sanctæ Mariæ Magdalenæ, anno Domini 1298, et cesa sunt ex Scottis apud Fawkyrk viginti duo millia, pro eo precipue quod dux Scottorum Willelmus de Walays, et alii magnates Scociæ, viso vexillo Edwardi regis Anglorum, dimiserunt exercitum suum sine capite ; et ideo fuit quasi totus peremptus. De exercitu autem Anglorum probus unicus Brianus de Jay, magister militiæ Templi in Anglia, tantum corruit, qui persequendo Willelmum de Walays perimebatur. Deinde rex Edwardus, dimissis exercitibus qui proterviam Scottorum adhuc remanentium refreenarent, in Angliam est reversus. Verumtamen Scotti, paulatim invalescentes, per 30 annos inde sequentes, usque ad tempora regis Edwardi tertii post conqueestum, Anglos et Anglorum fines sepius protriverunt, ut inferius referetur. Quod quidem infortunium dolo et effœminationi Anglorum [imputandum est], juxta prophetiam illam que, tempore regis Egelredi, preedixit gentem Anglorum per Dacos, Francos et Scottos, fore exterminandam.

Click to read more ...

Walsingham Chronica Majora. The king's warhorse, startled by the tumultuous shouting, threw him off just as he was mounting. Kicking out with its hind legs, it struck his side and broke two of his ribs. Nevertheless, the king mounted another horse and, despite his injury, did not fail to accompany the army as it advanced into battle. Accordingly, near the place called Falkirk, on the feast of Saint Mary Magdalene [22nd July 1298], William Wallace constructed a barrier between the Scottish and English armies, driving long stakes into the ground and binding them together with ropes and cords, so as to obstruct the English advance against his men. He then placed the Scottish infantry in the front line and said to them in their native language: "I have brought you to the ring, dance if you can."

The king, seeing the disposition of the Scots, ordered the Welsh to attack them. But because of the long-standing hatred which they bore towards the king, they delayed carrying out the command. They believed that the Scots, who were far more numerous than the English, would gain the victory, and that they themselves would consequently obtain the fulfilment of their wishes, join with the Scots in attacking the English, and courageously avenge the injuries long inflicted upon their people. When a certain knight saw them hesitating, he said satirically to the king:

"King Edward, if you place your trust in the Welsh, you are mistaken.

Rather than giving them plunder, strip them of their lands."

The king then gave the signal for battle to the first division and boldly attacked the Scots, breaking through the barrier. The two armies therefore engaged, but the Scottish cavalry immediately fled. The English pursued them, cutting them down and inflicting a great slaughter. The number of Scots who fell in this battle was estimated to have exceeded sixty thousand. At the beginning of the battle, the Master of the Knights Templar in England and his companion, who was Master of the Order in Scotland, threw themselves into the Scottish formation. Advancing before the others, they were overwhelmed and killed by the multitude pressing upon them. William Wallace and the leading men of Scotland fled from the battle into the woods. After this, the town of Saint Andrews was laid waste without resistance. From there, the English passed through the forest of Falkirk and came to Ayr Castle, which Robert Bruce had set on fire and abandoned as he fled. Passing through the town of Annan, they captured Lochmaben Castle. When the king reached Carlisle, the earls of Hereford and Norfolk, the Marshal, received permission to return to their own lands. The king then proceeded first to Durham, afterwards to Tynemouth, and from there to Cottingham near Beverley, where he remained to celebrate the feast of the Nativity of the Lord.

Dextrarius vero Regis, tumultuoso actus clamore, Regem jam ascendentem recalcitrando dejecit, laterique ejus calces posteriores allidens, duas ci costas confregit. Qui nihilominus ascendens cum alteram, progredientem ad prœlium comitari excrcitum non omisit. Itaque juxta locum, qui "Fowkyrke" dicitur, in die Beatw Mariæ Magdalenæ, Willelmus Waleys construxit sepem inter Scotorum exercitum et Anglorum, longos palos in ‘terram figens, et cum funibus nectens et cordis, ut ingressum Anglicorum ad suos impediret. Deinde pedestrem Scotorum populum in prima acie collocavit, dicens eis patria lingua ita;— "Y have brouʒth ʒou to the ryng, hoppe ʒef ʒe kunne."

Rex vero, videns dispositionem Scotorum, jussit Wallensibus ut eos aggredirentur. Sed ipsi, propter inveteratum odium quod gerebant ad Regem, negotium distulerunt; credentes quod Scoti, qui multo plures fuerunt quam Anglici, victoriam reportassent, et per consequens ipsi votorum suorum effecti compotes, in Anglicos cum Scotis communiter irruissent, et mala irrogata jamdudum genti suæ viriliter vindicassent. Cumque eos cunctantes quidam miles cerneret, satirice dixit Regi:—

"Rex Edwarde, fidem si des Wallensibus, erras ;

Ut dederas prædam, sed eorum diripe terras."

Rex vero, dato signo prœlii primæ cohorti, irruit in Scotos audacter, sepemque dirumpit. Congrediuntur igitur ambo exercitus; sed fugientibus statim Scotorum equitibus, Anglici insequuntur cædentes et stragem magnam ingerentes: ut eorum qui ceciderant de Scotis in hoc prœlio numerus æstimetur sexaginta millia excessisse, In principio autem prœlii, Præceptor Militiæ Templi in Anglia, et socius ejus, qui erat Præceptor Scotiæ, Scotorum agmini se immiscentes, ante alios oppressi, oppressorum multitudine sunt perempti. Willelmus Waleys et majores Scotiæ ab hoc prœlio ad nemora confugerunt. Post hæc, vastata est villa Sancti Andreæ, nemine resistente. Exinde per forestam de Felkirke venerunt Anglici ad castrum de Are, quod Robertus de Brus fugiens incendit, vacuumque reliquit, transeuntes per villam Anandiæ, ceperunt castrum de Lowmaban. Cum autem venisset Rex Karleolum, Comites Herefordiæ et Marescalli, licentia accepta, ad propria redierunt. Rex vero primo Dunelmiam, deinde Tynemutham, et inde usque Codingham, juxta Beverlacum, progressus, ibidem ut festum Natalis Domini perageret, expectavit.

Click to read more ...

Around 20th February 1304 a chevauchée of English knights including Robert Clifford 1st Baron Clifford [aged 29], William Latimer 2nd Baron Latimer of Corby [aged 28], John Mohun 1st Baron Dunster [aged 35], John Segrave 2nd Baron Segrave [aged 48] and the future King Robert the Bruce I of Scotland [aged 29] attempted, unsuccessfully, to capture Simon Fraser and William Wallace at Happrew, Peebles.

John of Fordun's Annals of the Scottish Nation. 111. Stirling Castle [Map] besieged by the King of England

Just after Easter, in the year 1304, that same king besieged Strivelyn [Map] Castle for three months without a break. For this siege, he commanded all the lead of the refectory of Saint Andrews [Map] to be pulled down, and had it taken away for the use of his engines. At last, the aforesaid castle was surrendered [20th July 1304] and delivered unto him on certain conditions, drawn up in writing, and sealed with his seal. But when he had got the castle, the king [aged 64] belied his troth, and broke through the conditions: for William Oliphant, the warden thereof, he threw bound into prison in London, and kept him a long time in thrall. The same year, when both great and small in the kingdom of Scotland (except William Wallace alone) had made their submission unto him; when the surrendered castles and fortified towns, which had formerly been broken down and knocked to pieces, had been all rebuilt, and he had appointed wardens of his own therein; and after all and sundry of Scottish birth had tendered him homage, the king, with the Prince of Wales [aged 19], and his whole army, returned to England. He left, however, the chief warden as his lieutenant, to amend and control the lawlessness of all the rest, both Scots and English. He did not show his face in Scotland after this.

In 1305 John Menteith [aged 30] captured William Wallace.

Around 5th August 1305, the exact date is uncertain, William Wallace was handed over to the English forces by John Menteith [aged 30] at Robroyston, Glasgow.

On 23rd August 1305 William Wallace was hanged, drawn and quartered at the Elms in Smithfield [Map]. His head being displayed on London Bridge [Map].

On 8th April 1956 a plaque was unveiled on the wall of St Bartholomew's Hospital near to the site of his execution the text of which reads...

To the immortal memory of Sir William Wallace Scottish patriot born at Elderslie Renfrewshire circa 1270 A.D. Who from the year 1296 fought dauntlessly in defence of his country's liberty and independence in the face of fearful odds and great hardship being eventually betrayed and captured brought to London and put to death near this spot on the 23rd August 1305.

His example heroism and devotion inspired those who came after him to win victory from defeat and his memory remains for all time a source of pride, honour and inspiration to his Countrymen.

"Dico tibi verum libertas optima rerum nunquam servili sub nexu vivito fili"

Translation: I tell you the truth, son, freedom is the best condition, never live like a slave

"Bas Agus Buaidh" aka Death and Victory, a traditional Scottish battle cry.

Click to read more ...

Annals of Six Kings of England by Nicholas Trivet [1258-1328]. 1305. The King of England, having settled the affairs of Scotland, returned into England, leaving John de Segrave, a noble knight, as guardian of the land. William Wallace, who had stirred Scotland to rebellion, was captured and brought to London; and there, having been judicially condemned, he was drawn, hanged, and finally beheaded: his head was set upon a pole in a prominent place in London, while his body, sent into Scotland, was divided into quarters, which were hung in different places for the terror of others.

1305. Rex Angliæ, ordinatis rebus Scotiæ, revertitur in Angliam, Joanne de Segrave, milite nobili, custode terræ relicto. Willelmus Waleis, qui Scotiam commoverat, captus Londonias ducitur; et ibidem judicialiter condemnatus, trahitur, suspenditur, et ultimo decollatur: cujus caput Londoniis in loco eminenti figitur super palum; corpus vero in Scotiam transmissum, divisum est in quartas, quæ ad aliorum terrorem in diversis partibus suspenduntur.

Illustrations of Scottish History. The following account of the capture and execution of Wallace is transcribed from the Arundel MS. 220, fol. 287, b. From internal evidence the volume appears to have been written about the year 1320, or shortly after.

In the year 1305 [5th August 1305], William Wallace was captured. He had first been a scoundrel and a thief, and later, during the Scottish war, was made a knight by the Scots and became their leader. He invaded Northumbria, which he largely burned, including even the noble church of Hexham. However, he was captured in the house of a certain Rowe Ra by Lord John of Menteith and brought to London by Lord John de Segrave. There, having received judgment, he was first drawn as a traitor, then hanged as a thief, then, while still alive, cut down and beheaded as a banished man. Afterward, he was disembowelled and his entrails were burned, just as he had burned churches full of men and women. Then his body was divided into four parts, just as he had wished to divide the people of Scotland from their king, Edward. His head was placed on display in London on the bridge; his right hand on the bridge at Newcastle upon Tyne above the public latrines; his right foot at Berwick; his left hand at Stirling; and his left foot at Perth, that is, the town of St. John [Perth].

Anno MCCC quinto, captus est Willelmus Waleys, qui primo fuit ribaldus et latro, et postea in guerra Scociae factus miles a Scotis, et ductor eorum factus, intravit Northumbriam, quam pro magna parte conbussit, sed etiam illam nobilem ecclesiam de Exilsham. Captus autem erat in domo cujusdam Rowe Ra per dominum Johannem de Menethet, et ductus Londonias per dominum Johannem de Segrave, ibique accepto judicio, ibique primo tractus tanquam traytour, postea suspensus tanquam latro, et vivus post deorsum dimissus decapitatus est tanquam forbannitus, deinde exentratus et viscera sua combusta sunt, sicut et ipse ecclesiam hominum et mulierum conbusserat. Post hoc in quatuor partes divisus, sicut et ipse gentem Scottorum voluit a rege suo Edwardo divisisse, caputque ejus suspensum est Londoniis super pontem, manus dextra super pontem apud Novum Castrum super Tynam ultra cloacas communes, pes dexter apud Berewyk, manus sinistra apud Strivelyn, et pes sinister apud Perth, id est villam Sancti Johannis.

Click to read more ...

Documents Illustrative of the Life of William Wallace Chapter 20. Memoranda respecting measures on the apprehension of Sir William Wallace.1

After 5th August 1305.

1. The Bishop of Chester, of Worcester... the Bishop of St... the Bishop of Worcester... the Earl of... Sir Adam Gurdon.

2. The letter to Sir Miles de Stapelton, William of [Berwick?], Renaud, etc., that they remit the sums.

3. Item: the letter from Mary, daughter of B[ernard or someone else—uncertain].

4. To remember the 40 marks that ought to be given to a valet who spied on William Wallace.

5. Item: the 60 marks that ought to be given to others, and the King wills that these 60, which were from the taking of the said William, be divided among them.

6. Concerning the letter: that is to say, the one by J. de Meneteth.

7. Concerning the appointment of those who will be in the Scottish business, etc.

8. Item: concerning the credit/validation of the letters, etc.

9. Item: concerning the writings from Scotland, etc., and the memoranda.

1. L Euesq de Cestř de Wyrecestř .... l Euesq de Seint .... l Euesq de Wyrecestr .... le Conte de .... Mons Ad Gurdon.

2. La lre a Mofs Mil de Stapelton Will de .... rgh .... Renaud &c. t q il remandet les somes.

3. It de la lre Marie fil B.

4. Fait a remembrer des XL mars q deyvent estre dones a un Vallet q espia Will le Waleys.

5. It de les LX mars q deyvent estre donez as autres , t le Roi voet q ces .... LX .... qui feurent a la pise du dit Willa p ptir entre eus

6. D la tre. cest assav c li p J. de Meneteth .

7. D smet de ceaux q sront au fail d Escoce &c.

8. It de la creance des lres &c.

9. It des escritz d Escoce &c . t des rembances.

Note 1. On a small pannel, written in a very loose manner. The first paragraph is written transversely, the others horizontally. The document appears to be a series of memoranda of business to be brought before the notice of the Parliament or Privy Council . It is here printed from the work last quoted, p. 295.

Click to read more ...

The Ancient Kalendars and Inventories Volume 1. After 5th August 1305. In the hanaper, among the rods, at such a sign.

Certain letters from Philip, King of France, John, King of Scotland, and Haakon, King of Norway, granting safe-conduct to William Wallace in their respective kingdoms, for travel to and from. Also included were some letters of ordinance and confederation made for the said William by certain magnates of Scotland. These letters were found with William Wallace when he was captured, and they were brought to the King (of England) at Kingston [by Sir John de Segrave].

In hanapio de virgis ad tale signu.

46. Quedam lre Phi Regis Franc, Johis Reg Scoc t Haqini Reg Norwag de conductu p eosdem Reges Willo le Waleys concesso in regnis eodem Regū eundo t redeundo cu quibʒd lřis de ordinacoibʒ t confederacoibʒ p quosdam Magnates Scoc psato Willo sce que lre invente suunt cu eodm Willo qando capt fuit t Dno R apud Kyngeston apportate [p Dnm J. de Segave.]

Annals Londonienses. In the same year, on the eleventh day before the Kalends of September [22nd August 1305], Sir William Wallace, a knight of Scottish birth, arrived in London. A great crowd of men and women came out to see him, and he was lodged in the house of William de Leyre, a citizen of London, in the parish of All Hallows at the Hay. On the following day, Monday [23rd August], the eve of Saint Bartholomew, he was led on horseback to Westminster. Sir John de Segrave and Sir Geoffrey de Segrave, along with the mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen of London, escorted and accompanied him, riding in procession with many others. In the Great Hall at Westminster, he was placed on the southern bench and was crowned with laurel leaves, because he had once claimed, as was commonly reported, that he ought to have worn a crown in that very hall. Immediately, he was called to judgment and was charged by Lord Peter Malory, justice of the King of England, as a traitor to the same king. Wallace replied that he had never been a traitor to the King of England, though he did admit to other charges brought against him. At length, the said Peter, together with the other justices, pronounced sentence, in the following terms:

Eodem anno, XI kalendas Septembris, dominus Willelmus Waleis miles, ex natione Scotica natus, venit Londonias; cui multitudo hominum ac mulierum ibi obviavit, et hospitabatur in domibus Willelmi de Leyre civis Londoniensis in parochia Omnium Sanctorum ad fenum. In crastino vero, qui dicitur dies Lune in vigilia Sancti Bartholomæi, ductus fuit equitando apud Westmonasterium; Johannes de Segrave et Galfridus de Segrave milites, major, vicecomites et aldermanni Londoniarum eum sequentes ac ducentes, cum pluribus aliis eundo et equitando, et in aula magna Westmonasterii super scamnum australe positus, ac cum foliis lauri coronatus; pro eo quod ipse asseruit, tempore prewterito, coronam in eadem aula portare deberet, sicut vulgariter dicebatur. Statim ipso vocato ad judicium, et per dominum Petrum Maluree, justitiarium domini regis Angliæ, pro traditore ejusdem regis aggressus; qui respondit se nunquam traditorem regis Anglisiæ fuisse, sed alia crimina sibi imposita concessit. Tandem dictus Petrus cum aliis justitiariis decrevit judicium, serie qua sequitur:

Click to read more ...

Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker of Swinbroke. In this year [23rd August 1305], William Wallace of Wales was drawn, hanged, and beheaded1 at London, having previously committed many crimes against the English in Scotland and the surrounding regions.

Hoc anno fuit subtractus, suspensus, et decapitatus Willelmus of William Wallace. Waleys apud Londonias, qui prius contra Anglicos in Scocia et partibus finitimis multa facinora perpetravit.

Note 1. In the Annales Londonienses (printed in Chronicles of the Reigns of Edward I and Edward II, Stubbs, Rolls Series, 1882, p. 139) It is also printed in Documents illustrative of Sir William Wallace, ed. Stevenson for the Maitland Club, 1841; and Stow incorporated a translation of it in his Annals. Wallace was executed on the 23rd August 1305.

Langtoft's Chronicle. [23rd August 1305] We have heard news, among companions,

Of William Wallace, the master of thieves;

Sir John de Meneteith followed him at his heels,

Took him in hiding by the side of his concubine;

Carried him to London in shackles and bonds,

Where he was judged on the following conditions:

In the first place to the gallows he was drawn for treasons,

Hanged for robberies and slaughters;

And because he had annihilated by burnings,

Towns and churches and monasteries,

He is taken down from the gallows, his belly opened,

His heart and his bowels burnt to cinders,

And his head cut off for such treasons as follow:

Because he had by his assumptions of authority

Maintained the war, given protections,

Seized into his subjection the lordship

Of another's kingdom by his usurpations.

His body was cut into four parts;

Each one hangs by itself, in memory of his name,

In place of his banner these are his gonfanons.1

Note 1. 'gonfanons' i.e. 'pennants'. The poem is suggesting his body parts are his banners.

Click to read more ...

John of Fordun's Annals of the Scottish Nation. 116. Death of William Wallace

In the year 1305, William Wallace was craftily and treacherously taken by John of Menteith [aged 30], who handed him over to the king of England [aged 66]; and he was, in London, torn limb from limb, and, as a reproach to the Scots, his limbs were hung on towers in sundry places throughout England and Scotland.

Adam Murimuth Continuation. In this year William Wallace was drawn, hanged, and beheaded1 at London, who had previously committed many acts of violence against the English in Scotland and the neighbouring regions.

Hoc anno fuit tractus suspensus, et decapitatus Wlillelmus Waleys apud Londonias, qui prius contra Anglicos in Scocia et partibus finitimis multa facinora perpetravit.

Note 1. William Wallace was executed on 23rd August 1305. Langtoft's Chronicle:

Of William Wallace, the master of thieves;

Sir John de Meneteith followed him at his heels,

Took him in hiding by the side of his concubine;

Carried him to London in shackles and bonds,

Where he was judged on the following conditions:

In the first place to the gallows he was drawn for treasons,

Hanged for robberies and slaughters;

And because he had annihilated by burnings,

Towns and churches and monasteries,

He is taken down from the gallows, his belly opened,

His heart and his bowels burnt to cinders,

And his head cut off for such treasons as follow:

Because he had by his assumptions of authority

Maintained the war, given protections,

Seized into his subjection the lordship

Of another's kingdom by his usurpations.

His body was cut into four parts;

Each one hangs by itself, in memory of his name,

In place of his banner these are his gonfanons [i.e. pennants].

Click to read more ...

Documents Illustrative of the Life of William Wallace Chapter 28. 23rd August 1305. It is adjudged that the aforesaid William [William Wallace], for the manifest sedition which he committed against his lord the king by feloniously plotting to kill him, by carrying the banner against his liege lord in mortal battle, and by attempting the annulment and overthrow of his crown and royal dignity, shall be drawn from the palace at Westminster to the Tower of London, and from the Tower to Aldgate, and thus through the middle of the city to Smithfield (Elmes), and for the robberies, murders, and felonies which he committed in the kingdom of England and the land of Scotland, he shall be hanged there, and afterwards cut down. And because he was outlawed, and was never restored to the king's peace, he shall be beheaded and decapitated. And afterwards, for the immense vileness he committed against God and Holy Church by burning churches, vessels, and reliquaries in which the body of Christ and the bodies and relics of the saints were placed, his heart, liver, lungs, and all his internal organs, from which such perverse thoughts proceeded, shall be cast into the fire and burned. And also, because he committed the aforesaid sedition, depredations, arsons, murders, and felonies not only against his lord the king but against all the people of England and Scotland, the body of the said William shall be cut and divided into four quarters, and his head thus severed shall be set upon London Bridge in view of those passing by both by land and by water, and one quarter shall be hung on the gibbet at Newcastle upon Tyne, another quarter at Berwick, a third quarter at Stirling, and the fourth quarter at St. John's Town (Perth), as a warning and punishment to all who pass by and see them, etc.

Consideratum est quod prædictus Willelmus pro manifesta seditione quam ipsi domino regi secerat felonice machinando, in mortem ejus perpetrando, annulationem et enervationem coronæ et regiæ dignitatis suæ vexillum contra dominum suum ligium in bello mortali deferendo, detrahatur a palatio Westmonasterii ussque Turrim London, et a Turri usque Allegate, et sic per medium civitatis usque Elmes, et pro roberiis et homicidiis et feloniis, quas in regno Angliæ et terra Scotia fecit, ibidem sufsendatur et poftea devaletur. Et quia utlagatus fuit, nec postea ad pacem domini regis restitutus, decolletur et decapitetur. Et postea pro immensa vilitate, quam Deo et sacrosanctæ ecclesiæ fecit comburendo ecclesias, vasa et feretra, in quibus corpus Christi et corpora sanctorum et reliquiæ eorundem collocabantur, cor, epar, et pulmo et omnia interiora ipsius Willelmi, a quibus tam perversæ cogitationes processerunt, in ignem mittantur et comburentur. Et etiam, quia non solum ipsi domino regi, sed toti plebi Angliæ et Scotiæ, prædicta seditionem, deprædationes, incendia, et homicidia et felonias fecerat, corpus illius Willelmi in quatuor quarteria scindatur et dividatur, et caput sic abscissum assedatur super pontem London, in conspectu tam per terram quam per aquam transeuntium, et unum quarterium suspendatur in gibetto apud Novum Castrum super Tynam, aliud quarterium apud Berewyk, tertium quarterium apud Stryvelyn, et quartum quarterium apud Villam Sancti Johannis, in metum et castigationem omnium prætereuntium et ea conspicientium, & c.

Click to read more ...

Documents Illustrative of the Life of William Wallace Chapter 28. Edward [aged 66], by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, and Duke of Aquitaine, to his beloved and faithful subjects John de Segrave, Peter Maluree, Ralph de Sandwich, John de Bacuelle, and John le Blound, Mayor of his city of London, greetings.

Know that we have appointed you as our justices to deliver from our prison in our city of London the prisoner William Wallace, according to the ordinance that has been enjoined upon you by us. And therefore, we command you that on a certain day and at a certain place, which you, all four or three of you, shall determine, you deliver the aforesaid William from the said prison in the aforementioned manner. And you, the aforementioned John de Segrave, in whose custody the aforesaid William is held, by our special command shall cause the said William and his attachment to appear before you there on the said day and place. In witness whereof, we have caused these our letters to be made patent

Witness myself at Rotherhithe, on the 18th day of August [1305], in the 33rd year of our reign.

By writ of the privy seal.

Edwardus, Dei gratia rex Angliæ, dominus Hiberniæ, et dux Aquitaniæ, dilectis et fidelibus suis Johanni de Segrave, Petro Maluree, Radulfo de Sandwyco, Johanni de Bacuelle, et Johanni le Blound, majori civitatis suæ London, salutem.

Sciatis quod constituimus vos Justiciarios nostros ad prisonam nostram civitatis nostræ London de Willelmo le Waleis deliberandum, juxta ordinationem vobis per nos inde injunctam. Et ideo vobis mandamus quod ad certas diemu et locum, quos vos omnes, quatuor vel tres vestrum ad hoc provideritis, prisonam prædictam de prædicto Willelmo deliberetis in forma prædicta. Et vos præfatus Johs de Segrave, in cujus custodia præfatus Willelmus existit, de mandato nostro speciali ad prædictos diem et locum præfatum Willelmum et ejus attachiamentum coram vobis ibidem venire faciatis. In cujus rei testimonium has litteras nostras fieri fecimus patentes.

Teste meipso apud Raurethe, xviij. die Augusti, anno regni nostri xxxiij.

Per breve de sigillo privato.

Note u. Dies, MS.

Click to read more ...

Documents Illustrative of the Life of William Wallace Chapter 28. 22nd August 1305. In the same year, on the eleventh day before the Kalends of September (August 22), Sir William Wallace, a knight born of Scottish nationality, came to London, where a multitude of men and women met him, and he was hosted in the house of William de Leyre, a citizen of London, in the parish of All Saints at Hay.

Eodem anno xj.r Kalendas Septembris, dominus Willelmus Waleis, miles, ex natione Scotica natus, venit London, cui multitudo hominum ac mulierum fibi obviavit, et hospitabatur in domibus Willelmi de Leyre, civis London, in parochia Omnium Sanctorum ad Fœnums.

Note r. Nono, MS. Harg.

Note s. Fenchurch Street.

Annals Londonienses. "Pleas at Westminster before John de Segrave, P. Maluree, R. de Sandwich, John de Bakewell, and J. le Blound, mayor of the king's City of London, on Monday, the vigil of St Bartholomew [23rd August 1305], in the thirty-third year of the reign of King Edward, son of Henry."

"William Wallace, a Scot born in Scotland, having been taken for sedition, homicides, robberies, burnings, and various other felonies, appeared. The same justices then recited how, after the aforesaid lord king had conquered the land of Scotland by force of arms from John Balliol, the prelates, earls, barons, and others of that land who were his enemies, through the forfeiture of the said John, and after, by that conquest, he had subjected and brought all the Scots under his lordship and royal power as their king, had publicly received the homage and fealty of the prelates, earls, barons, and very many others, had caused his peace to be proclaimed throughout the whole land of Scotland, and had ordained and appointed guardians of that land to hold his place, together with sheriffs, provosts, bailiffs, and his other ministers, to maintain his peace and to administer justice to everyone according to the laws and customs of that land, the aforesaid William le Wallace, unmindful of his fealty and allegiance, with every felony and sedition that he could devise having been premeditated, rose against the lord king, having gathered and confederated with himself an immense number of felons, and feloniously attacked and assaulted the king's guardians and ministers. He feloniously, and against the peace of the lord king, assaulted, wounded, and killed William de Heselrigg, Sheriff of Lanark, while he was holding the king's pleas in the full county court. Afterwards, in contempt of the king, he cut the sheriff, thus slain, limb from limb. From that time onwards, having gathered as great a multitude as he could of armed men adhering to him and to his felony, he attacked the towns, cities, and castles of that land. He caused his own writs to be issued and carried throughout Scotland as though they were the writs of the superior lord of that land. After all the guardians and ministers of the aforesaid lord king had been driven from the land of Scotland by the said William, he held and convened his own parliaments and assemblies. Nor was he willing to be restrained within such great wickedness and sedition, but counselled all the prelates, earls, and barons of that land who adhered to his party to subject themselves to the fealty and lordship of the king of France, and to devote themselves to assisting in the destruction of the realm of England. Taking with him certain of his accomplices, he also entered the realm of England, namely the counties of Northumberland, Cumberland, and Westmorland. All those whom he found there faithful to the king of England he feloniously killed by various forms of death. He feloniously and seditiously slaughtered, burned, and laid waste religious men, nuns dedicated to God, and churches built in honour of God and his saints, together with the bodies of saints and their other relics honourably placed within them. He spared no one who used the English tongue, but subjected all, old men together with young, wives together with widows and virgins, infants together with sucklings, to deaths more grievous than he had known how to devise. Thus, on every day and at every hour, he seditiously and feloniously persisted in plotting the death of the lord king and in the manifest annulment and weakening of his crown and royal majesty. And although, after such enormous and horrible deeds, the aforesaid lord king entered the land of Scotland with his great army, defeated the aforesaid William, who bore a banner against him in mortal battle, together with his other enemies, granted his firm peace to all the people of that land, and mercifully caused the aforesaid William le Wallace to be recalled to his peace, the same William, persisting seditiously, feloniously, resolutely, and wilfully in his aforesaid wickedness, disdained to submit himself to the peace of the aforesaid lord king or to come into it. Thus, in the court of the lord king, he was publicly outlawed as a seducer, robber, and felon, according to the laws and customs of England and Scotland. Since it is deemed and held unjust and contrary to the laws of England that anyone so outlawed and placed outside the law, and not afterwards restored to the king's peace, should be admitted to defend his condition or to make answer, it was adjudged that the aforesaid William, for the manifest sedition which he had committed against the lord king, feloniously plotting and striving to bring about his death, the annulment and weakening of his crown and royal dignity, and bearing a banner against his liege lord in mortal battle, should be drawn from the Palace of Westminster to the Tower of London, and from the Tower to Aldgate, and thence through the midst of the city to the Elms. For the robberies, homicides, and felonies which he committed in the realm of England and the land of Scotland, he shall there be hanged and afterwards cut down. Because he was outlawed and was not afterwards restored to the lord king's peace, he shall have his head cut off and be beheaded. Afterwards, for the immeasurable sacrilege which he committed against God and the Holy Church by burning churches, vessels, and shrines in which the body of Christ and the bodies and relics of the saints were placed, the heart, liver, lungs, and all the entrails of the said William, from which such perverse thoughts proceeded, shall be cast into the fire and burned. And because he committed the aforesaid sedition, robberies, burnings, homicides, and felonies not only against the lord king himself but against the whole people of England and Scotland, the body of the said William shall be cut and divided into four quarters. His head, thus severed, shall be set upon London Bridge, in the sight of those passing both by land and by water. One quarter shall be hung upon the gibbet at Newcastle upon Tyne, another quarter at Berwick, the third quarter at Stirling, and the fourth quarter at the town of St John [Perth], for the fear and chastisement of all who pass by and behold them, and so forth."

"Placita apud Westmonasterium coram Johanne de Segrave, P. Maluree, R. de Sandwyco, Johanne de Bacwelle et J.le Blound majore civitatis regis Londoniarum, die Lunæ in vigilia Sancti Bartholomei, anno regni regis Edwardi filii Henrici XXXIII."

"Willelmus Waleys, Scotus et de Scotia ortus, captus pro seditione, homicidiis, deprædationibus, incendiis et aliis diversis feloniis, venit, et, recitato per eosdem justitiarios, qualiter, postquam prædictus dominus rex terram Scotiæ super Johannem Baillol, prælatos, comites, barones, et alios ejusdem terræ inimicos suos, per forisfacturam ipsius Johannis hostiliter conquisivisseet, et conquestu illius omnes Scotos dominio et regiæ potestati suæ ut eorum regi submisisset et subjugasset, homagia et fidelitates prælatorum, comitum, baronum et aliorum plurimorum publice recepisset, pacemque suam per totam terram Scotiæ proclamari fecisset, custodes terræ illius locum suum tenentes, vicecomites, præpositos, ballivos et alios ministros suos, ad pacem suam manutenendam et justitiam quibuscumque secundum leges et consuetudines terræ illius faciendam, ordinasset et statuisset, prædictus Willelmus lo Waleys, fidelitatis et liganciæ suæ inmoemor, omni qua poterat felonin ac seditione præcogitata, in ipsum dominum regem, adunato sibi et confœderato inmenso numero felonum, surrexit, et custodes et ministros ipsius regis felonice invasit et inpugnavit; et Willelmum de Hesebregg, vicecomitem de Lanarke, qui placita ipsius regis [tenuit] in pleno comitatu, felonice et contra pacem ipsius domini regis, insultavit, vulueravit et interfecit; et postes in contemptum ipsius regis, ipsum vicecomitem sic interfectum frustatim dimicavit. Et ex tunc, omni qua poterat multitudine armatorum sibi et feloniæ suæ adhærentium adunats, villas, civitates et castra terræ illius invasit, et brevia sua per totam Scotiam, tanquam brevis superioris illius terræ emanare fecit et demandavit, parlismenta et congregationces suns, omnibus custodibus et ministris predicti domini regis de terra Scotiæ per ipsum Willelmum dejectis, tenuit et assedit, neo tanta noquitia et seditione volens contineri, consulnit omnibus prælatis, comitibus et baronibus terræ suæ, parti euæ adhærentibus, quod fidelitati et dominio regis Franciæ se subjugarent; et ed destructionem regni Angliæ in auxilium insisterent. Quosdam otiam de complicibus suis secum assumens, regnum Angliæ, ut in oomitatibus Northumberland, Comberland et Westmerland, ingrediebatur, et omnes quos ibidem de fidelitate rogis Angliæ invenit, diversis mortis goneribus felonice interfecit, viros religiosos et moniales Deo dicatas, eb ecclesias ad honorem Dei et guorum sanctorum constructas, una cum corporibus sanctorum et aliis reliquiis eorum in eis honorifice collocatis, felonice et geditiose mactavit, combussit et devastavit, nemini qui lingnn Anglicans utebatur peporcit, sed omnes senes cam juvenibus, aponsas cum viduis et virginibus, infantes cum lactantibus, graviore morto quam excogitare sciverat afficiebat: sicque singalis diebus et horis, in machinationem mortis ipsius domini regis, et in coronæ et regiæ majestatis suæ annallntionem et enervationem manifestam, seditiose et felonice perseverabat. Et licet post tam enormia et horribilin facta prædictus dominus rex, cum magno suo exercitu, terram Scotiæ invasisset, et prædictum Willelmum, vexillum contra eum in bello mortali deferentem, et alios inimicos suos devicisset, firmamque pacem suam omnibus de terra illa concessisset, et prædictun Willelmum le Waleis ad pacem suom misericorditer revocari fecisset; idem Willelmus, in sta prænotata nequitia seditiose et felonice concorditer et animose perseverans, paci prædicti domini regis se submittere et ad eam evenire contempsit; et sic in ouria ipsius domini regis ut seductor, prædo et feld, secundum leges et consuetudines Angliæ et Scotiæ, publice fait utlagatus; et injustum et legibus Anglicanis dissonum existat, et creditur, aliquem sic utlagatum et extra leges positum, nec postes ad pacem ipsius restitutum, ad defensionem status sui seu responsionem admitti; consideratum est quod prædictus Willelmus pro manifesta seditione quam ipsi domino regi fecerat, felonice machinando, in mortem ejus perpetrando, annullationem et enervationem coronæ et regiæ dignitatis suæ, vexillum contra dominum suum liginm in bello mortali deferendo, detrahatur & palatio Westmonasterii usque Turrim Londoniarum, et & Turri usque Allegate, et sic per medium civitatis usque Elmes, et pro roberiis et homicidiis et feloniis quas in regno Angliæ et terra Scotiæ fecit ibidem suspendatur et postes devaletur. Et quias utlagatus fuit, nec postoa ad pacem domini regis restitutus, decolletur et decapitetur. Et postea, pro immensa vilitate quam Deo et sacrosanctæ ecclesiæ fecit comburendo ecclesias, vasa et feretra, in quibus corpus Christi et corpora sanctorum et reliquiæ eorundem collocabantur; cor, hepar et pulmo et omnia interiora ipsius Willelmi, a quibus tam perverse cogitationes processerunt, in ignem mittantur et comburentur. Et etiam quis non solum ipsi domino regi, sed toti plebi Angliæ et Scotiæ, prædicta seditionem, deprædationes, incendia et homicidis et felonias fecerat, corpus illius Willelmi in quatuor quarteria scindatur et dividatur, et caput sic abscissum sasedatur super pontem Londoniensem, in conspectu tam per terram — quam per aquam transeuntium; et unum quarterium suspendatur in gibetto apud Novam Castram super Tynam, aliud quarterium apud Berewyk; tertium quarterium apud Stryvelyn; et quartam quarterium apud villam Sancti Johannis, in metum et castigationem omnium prætereuntium et ea conspicientium, etc."

Click to read more ...

Documents Illustrative of the Life of William Wallace Chapter 28. 23rd August 1305. Pleas at Westminster before John de Segrave, Peter Maluree, Ralph de Sandwich, John de Bacwelle, and John le Blound, Mayor of the King's city of London, on Monday, on the eve of Saint Bartholomew, in the 33rd year of the reign of King Edward, son of Henry.

William Wallace, a Scot by birth and origin, captured for sedition, murders, plunderings, arsons, and various other felonies, came forth, and it was recited by the justices how, after the said lord king had conquered the land of Scotland from John Balliol, prelates, earls, barons, and other enemies of his land by the forfeiture of John, and had subdued all Scots to his dominion and royal power as their king, and had publicly received the homages and fealties of the prelates, earls, barons, and many others, and had caused his peace to be proclaimed throughout the land of Scotland, and had appointed and established custodians of that land in his place, sheriffs, provosts, bailiffs, and other officials to maintain his peace and to administer justice to all according to the laws and customs of that land, the aforesaid William Wallace, unmindful of his loyalty and allegiance, rose up in all the felony and premeditated sedition he could muster against the said lord king, gathering to himself and conspiring with a vast number of felons, and feloniously attacked and assaulted the custodians and officials of the said king, and feloniously, and against the peace of the said lord king, assaulted, wounded, and killed William de Heselrig, sheriff of Lanark, who was holding the king's pleas in full county court, and afterward, in contempt of the said king, had the sheriff thus killed dismembered. And from that time onward, gathering to himself all the armed multitudes he could, and adhering to his felony, he invaded towns, cities, and castles of that land, issued his own writs throughout all Scotland as if they were the writs of a sovereign of that land, and held and convened his own parliaments and assemblies, having deposed all the custodians and officials of the said lord king in the land of Scotland through himself. Not content with such wickedness and sedition, he advised all the prelates, earls, and barons of his land who adhered to his party to submit to the fealty and dominion of the King of France and to seek aid for the destruction of the kingdom of England.

Placita apud Westmonasterium coram Johanne de Segrave, P. Maluree, R. de Sandwyco, Johanne de Bacwelle et J. le Blound Majore civitatis regis London, die lunæ in vigilia Sancti Bartholomæi, anno regni regis Edwardi, filii Henrici, xxxiij.

Willelmus Waleis Scotus et de Scotia ortus, captus pro seditione, micidiis, deprædacionibus, incendiis, et aliis diversis feloniis, venit, et recitato per eosdem justiciarios qualiter, postquam prædictus dominus rex terram Scotia super Johannem Baillol, prælatos, comites, barones et alios ejusdem terræ inimicos suos, per forissacturam ipsius Johannis, hostiliter conquisivisset, et conquæstu illius omnes Scotos dominio et regiæ potestati suæ, ut eorum regi, submisisset et subjugasset, homagia et fidelitates prælatorum, comitum, baronum, et aliorum plurimorum publice recepisset, pacemque suam per totam terram Scotia proclamari secisset, Custodes terræ illius, locum suum tenentes, vicecomites, præpositos, ballivos et alios ministros suos ad pacem suam manutenendam et justitiam quibuscunque secundum leges et consuetudines terræ illius faciendam, ordinassset et statuisset, prædictus Willelmum le Waleys, fidelitatis et ligancia fuæ immemor, omnia quæv poterat felonia ac seditione præcogitata in ipsum dominum regem, adunato fibi et confœderato immenso numero felonum, surrexit, et custodes et ministros ipsius regis felonice invafit et impugnavit, et Willelmum de Hesebreggw, vicecomitem de Lanarke, qui placita ipsius regis in plenox comitatu [ ], felonice et contra pacem ipsius domini regis insultavit, vulneravit et interfecit, et postea, in contemptum ipsius regis, ipsum vicecomitem sic interfectum, frustratim dimicavit. Et ex sunc omni qua poterat multitudine armatorum sibi et feloniæ suæ adhærentium adunata, villas, civitates, et castra terræ illius invasit, et brevia sua per totam Scotiam, tanquam brevia superioris illius terræ, emanare fecit et demandavit, parliamenta et congregationes suas, omnibus custodibus et ministris prædicti domini regis de terra Scotia per ipsum Willelmum dejectis, tenuit et assedit; nec tanta nequitia et seditione volens contineri, consuluit omnibus prælatis, comitibus et baronibus terræ suæ parti suæ adhærentibus, quod fidelitati et dominio regis Franciæ se subjugarent, et ad destructionem regni Angliæ in auxilium insisterent.

Note v. Omni qua (?)

Note w. Such is the reading of the MS., but there is reason for believing that it is an error for " Heselregg. " See, however, the extract from Fordun.

Note x. The MS. reads "plano."

Click to read more ...

Account of the Battle of Falkirk. MS. Digby 168, folio 197b. Bodleian Library, Oxford.1

In the year of our Lord 1297, when the said King Edward had crossed over into Flanders, around the feast of the Beheading of St. John the Baptist, once again the Scots rebelled under a certain rogue leader named William Wallace, who had frequently been outlawed even by his own people for his crimes, and whom the king, because of his wickedness, had not received into his peace. The Scots, acting under his command with excessive cruelty, invaded Northumberland and Westmorland, devastating everything, sparing neither age nor sex ... King Edward returned to England, as did also the army that had been in Gascony. The king, having gathered a large army, went into Scotland to fight against those rebels and oath-breakers. Finding them assembled against him in great numbers, he engaged them in battle; and, with God's favor, he gained the victory. And this was the manner of that battle.

Anno vero Domini M. CC. 97, cum dictus Rex Edwardus transfretasset in Flandriam circa videlicet fesftum Decollacionis sancti Johannis Baptiste,2 iterum rebellaverunt Scoti duce quodam riballo dicto Willelmo Waleys, frequenter eciam a fuis propter scelere sua forbannito, quem Rex propter illius maliciam ad pacem suam non admiserat. Scoti igitur ipsius ducatu nimia crudelitate sevientes Nothahumbr. et Westmoriam invadentes omnia devastant ac succedunt etati non parcentes nec sexui .... Rediit Rex Edwardus in Angliam et eciam exercitus illius qui fuerat in Wasconia. Rex, congregato exercitu copioso, adivit Scociam, contra rebelles sibi ac perjuros pugnaturus, quos in multitudine gravi contra se coadunatos reperiens aggreditur et commisso prelio, annuente Deo, victoria potitur. Et fuit hujus modi bellum.

Note 1. This is a Chronicle of England from Brute to the year 1305. It has been ascribed to Peter de Ickham. The author, whoever he was, was present at the funeral of William de Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, in the church of the Minorites at Worcester, 1298.

Note 2. The king embarked on Thursday, 22 August, 1297, at Winchelsea. Patent Rolls, 16 Edw. I., part 2, m. 7.

Click to read more ...

John of Fordun's Annals of the Scottish Nation. 110. The Estates of Scotland make their submission to the King of England

The same year, after the whole Estates of Scotland had made their submission to the king of England, John Comyn, then guardian, and all the magnates but William Wallace, little by little, one after another, made their submission unto him; and all their castles and towns except Strivelyn Castle [Map], and the warden thereof were surrendered unto him. That year, the king kept Lent at Saint Andrews [Map], where he called together all the great men of the kingdom, and held his parliament; and he made such decrees as he would, according to the state of the country which, as he thought, had been gotten and won for him and his successors for ever as well as about the dwellers therein.